ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Double Hyperautofluorescence Rings as a Sign of CFAP410-related Retinopathy.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular analysis of foveoschisis in females reveals a novel case of segmental uniparental disomy in X-linked retinoschisis.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Non-invasive biomarkers for diabetic complications: insights from corneal and retinal imaging.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Expanding the genotypic and phenotypic spectra with a novel variant in the ciliopathy gene,Ophthalmic genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Variants in CFAP410 have been reported to cause retinal dystrophy with or without systemic symptoms. This study was designed to characterize the fundus changes of patients with biallelic variants in CFAP410. Methods: Variants in CFAP410 were identified through whole exome sequencing and targeted exome sequencing of 10,530 probands. Biallelic variants in CFAP410 were evaluated by comprehensive in silico analysis and confirmed by Sanger sequencing and segregation analysis. Ocular phenotypes including fundus photographs, scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, autofluorescence images, ERG, and optical coherence tomography were characterized. Results: Nine patients from eight families were homozygotes or compound heterozygotes for a total of four variants in CFAP410, including c.144-6_159del (novel), c.340_351dup, c.347C>T, and c.545+1G>A. Three patients were diagnosed with cone-rod dystrophy, and the remaining six patients with RP. Among eight patients performed with ultra-wide scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, double hyperautofluorescence rings inside and outside of the macular vascular arcades were observed in six patients, and the remaining two older patients demonstrated single hyperautofluorescence ring surrounded by pigmentation. CFAP410-associated retinopathy in early stage was generally tapetoretinal degeneration without noticeable bone spicule pigmentation, with more severe degeneration in the inferior nasal retina. ERG recordings delineated a severely reduced cone response and mildly to severely reduced rod response. Posterior staphyloma was seen in seven patients who underwent optical coherence tomography examinations. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the fundus characteristics of patients with biallelic variants in CFAP410 and expands the genotype-phenotype spectrum of CFAP410-related retinal degeneration, in which posterior staphyloma together with double hyperautofluorescence rings might be common peculiar signs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.