Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153733›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Brain Health After COVID-19, Pneumonia, Myocardial Infarction, or Critical Illness.

Costanza Peinkhofer, Pardis Zarifkar, Rune Haubo B Christensen, Vardan Nersesjan, Lise Fonsmark, Charlotte Merie, Anne-Mette Lebech, Terese Lea Katzenstein, Lia Evi Bang, Jesper Kjærgaard and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Costanza PeinkhoferDepartment of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pardis ZarifkarDepartment of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rune Haubo B ChristensenCopenhagen Research Center for Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vardan NersesjanCopenhagen Research Center for Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lise FonsmarkDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte MerieDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne-Mette LebechDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Terese Lea KatzensteinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lia Evi BangDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper KjærgaardDepartment of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pradeesh SivapalanDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens-Ulrik Stæhr JensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Eriksen BenrosCopenhagen Research Center for Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Daniel KondziellaDepartment of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKGentofte Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Brain health is most likely compromised after hospitalization for COVID-19; however, long-term prospective investigations with matched control cohorts and face-to-face assessments are lacking. Objective: To assess whether long-term cognitive, psychiatric, or neurological complications among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 differ from those among patients hospitalized for other medical conditions of similar severity and from healthy controls. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study with matched controls was conducted at 2 academic hospitals in Copenhagen, Denmark. The case cohort comprised patients with COVID-19 hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. Control cohorts consisted of patients hospitalized for pneumonia, myocardial infarction, or non-COVID-19 intensive care-requiring illness between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, and healthy age- and sex-matched individuals. The follow-up period was 18 months; participants were evaluated between November 1, 2021, and February 28, 2023. Exposures: Hospitalization for COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall cognition, assessed by the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Secondary outcomes were executive function, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and neurological deficits. Results: The study included 345 participants, including 120 patients with COVID-19 (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [14.4] years; 70 men [58.3%]), 125 hospitalized controls (mean [SD] age, 66.0 [12.0] years; 73 men [58.4%]), and 100 healthy controls (mean [SD] age, 62.9 [15.3] years; 46 men [46.0%]). Patients with COVID-19 had worse cognitive status than healthy controls (estimated mean SCIP score, 59.0 [95% CI, 56.9-61.2] vs 68.8 [95% CI, 66.2-71.5]; estimated mean MoCA score, 26.5 [95% CI, 26.0-27.0] vs 28.2 [95% CI, 27.8-28.6]), but not hospitalized controls (mean SCIP score, 61.6 [95% CI, 59.1-64.1]; mean MoCA score, 27.2 [95% CI, 26.8-27.7]). Patients with COVID-19 also performed worse than healthy controls during all other psychiatric and neurological assessments. However, except for executive dysfunction (Trail Making Test Part B; relative mean difference, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.01-1.31]), the brain health of patients with COVID-19 was not more impaired than among hospitalized control patients. These results remained consistent across various sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: This prospective cohort study suggests that post-COVID-19 brain health was impaired but, overall, no more than the brain health of patients from 3 non-COVID-19 cohorts of comparable disease severity. Long-term associations with brain health might not be specific to COVID-19 but associated with overall illness severity and hospitalization. This information is important for putting understandable concerns about brain health after COVID-19 into perspective.

Indexed as

COVID-19Myocardial InfarctionPneumoniaAgedBrainCritical IllnessHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38153733
PMCPMC10755623
OpenAlexW4390347028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.