Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153640›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

Postoperative Complications After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Upfront Surgery in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Nationwide Study in Finland.

Emilia Putila, Olli Helminen, Mika Helmiö, Heikki Huhta, Aapo Jalkanen, Raija Kallio, Vesa Koivukangas, Arto Kokkola, Simo Laine, Elina Lietzen and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Emilia PutilaSurgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. emilia.putila@student.oulu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6135-189X
Olli HelminenSurgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Mika HelmiöDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Heikki HuhtaSurgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Aapo JalkanenDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Raija KallioDepartment of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Vesa KoivukangasSurgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Arto KokkolaDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Simo LaineDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Elina LietzenDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Johanna LouhimoDepartment of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Sanna MeriläinenSurgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Vesa-Matti PohjanenCancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Tuomo RantanenDepartment of Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Anna JunttilaDivision of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Ari RistimäkiDepartment of Pathology, HUSLAB, HUS Diagnostic Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jari V RäsänenDepartment of General Thoracic and Oesophageal Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Juha SaarnioSurgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Eero SihvoDepartment of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Vesa ToikkanenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart Center, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Tuula TyrväinenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Antti ValtolaDepartment of Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Joonas H KauppilaSurgery Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Research Center Oulu, University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
FINEGO Group
Oulu University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FITurku University Hospital · FITampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo date, no large population-based studies have compared complications and short-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and upfront surgery in gastric cancer. More nationwide studies with standardized reporting on complications are needed to enable international comparison between studies. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications between neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in a population-based setting.

methodsThis population-based study based on the Finnish National Esophago-Gastric Cancer Cohort included all patients 18 years of age or older undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland during 2005-2016. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), both crude and adjusted for key confounders. Different types of complications were graded based on the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definitions, and major complications were assessed by the Clavien-Dindo scale.

resultsThis study analyzed 769 patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase major postoperative complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with upfront surgery (OR, 1.12; 95% CI 0.81-1.56). Furthermore, it did not increase pneumonia, anastomotic complications, wound complications, or other complications.

conclusionsNeoadjuvant therapy is not associated with increased postoperative complications, reoperations, or short-term mortality compared with upfront surgery in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultFinlandGastrectomyHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38153640
PMCPMC10908606
OpenAlexW4390311769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.