Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153533›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2025

Low translational and rotational movements with 2-point stainless-steel retainers over a period of 1 and 3 years.

Sarah Koller, Christian Niederau, Irma Azraq, Rogerio Bastos Craveiro, Isabel Knaup, Michael Wolf

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah KollerDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Clinic, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Christian NiederauDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Clinic, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. cniederau@ukaachen.de.
Irma AzraqDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Clinic, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Rogerio Bastos CraveiroDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Clinic, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Isabel KnaupDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Clinic, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Michael WolfDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental Clinic, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DESpiegel Institut (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLong-term stabilization of orthodontic treatment outcomes is an everyday challenge in orthodontics. The use of permanently attached lingual retainers has become gold standard. However, in some cases, patients with fixed lingual retainers show retainer-associated side effects. Aiming to reduce these side effects, clinical knowledge about how tooth and arch form stability adaption takes place over time is important to improve long-term retention protocols. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate occlusion stability and risks for a newly developing malocclusion in a time-dependent manner in patients being treated with permanent 2‑point steel retainers. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, a total of 66 consecutive patients with round stainless-steel retainers were analyzed for postorthodontic occlusion changes after 1 year (group 1, n = 33) and 3 years (group 2, n = 33). Digital Standard Tessellation Language (STL) datasets of the lower jaw were obtained before retainer insertion (T0), and after a 1- (T1) or 3‑year (T2) retention period. Using superimposition software, T1 and T2 situations were compared to T0 regarding rotational and translational changes in tooth positions in all three dimensions.

resultsOcclusion changes were low in both groups. The investigated lower canines were nearly stable in the 1‑ and 3‑year group, although a retention-time-dependent increase in tooth position change of the central and lateral incisors could be observed.

conclusionThe present data provide evidence for time-dependent development of posttherapeutic occlusal adaption limited to central and lateral incisors in patients treated with a 2-point retainer. The observed occlusal changes should be interpreted as an occlusal adaption process rather than severe posttreatment changes associated with the orthodontic retainer.

Indexed as

MalocclusionOrthodontic RetainersStainless SteelTooth Movement TechniquesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleOrthodontic Appliance DesignRetrospective StudiesRotationTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultStainless SteelChanges in dental occlusionFixed orthodontic appliancesRetention protocolRetention stabilityTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID38153533
PMCPMC12181113
OpenAlexW4390346222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.