SynthesisInflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.]2024
Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators as an induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- S1P receptor modulators for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- Sphingosine 1-Phosphate (S1P) Receptor Modulators as an Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Interlukin-23 inhibitors as an induction and maintenance therapy for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta‑analysis of randomized controlled trials.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of the S1PR modulator etrasimod in the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis during the induction phase: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Alterations of sphingosine-1-phosphate and its receptors in type 1 diabetes mellitus: an integrated clinical and single-cell transcriptomic study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Probiotics: a promising future in the treatment of ulcerative colitis?Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- Etrolizumab as an induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Review
- Raising the bar in ulcerative colitis management.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveOne sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator is approved (ozanimod) and another (etrasimod) is under investigation for the induction and maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis (UC). We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S1P modulators in patients with active UC.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching: PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through May 13th, 2023. We used the fixed-effect model to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
resultsFive RCTs with a total of 1990 patients were included. S1P receptor modulators were significantly associated with increased clinical response during both the induction (RR 1.71 with 95% CI [1.50, 1.94], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 1.89 with 95% CI [1.33, 2.69], P = 0.0004); clinical remission rates during both induction (RR 2.76 with 95% CI [1.88, 4.05], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 3.34 with 95% CI [1.41, 7.94], P = 0.006); endoscopic improvement during both induction (RR 2.15 with 95% CI [1.71, 2.70], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 2.41 with 95% CI [1.15, 5.05], P = 0.02); and histologic remission during both induction (RR 2.60 with 95% CI [1.89, 3.57] [1.17, 2.10], P = 0.00001) and maintenance phases (RR 2.52 with 95% CI [1.89, 3.37], P = 0.00001). Finally, there was no difference regarding safety outcomes as compared to placebo in both the induction and maintenance phases.
conclusionS1P receptor modulators are effective in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with moderate to severe UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.