SynthesisActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2023
Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes After Bryan Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introductionː Cervical disk arthroplasty is a potential alternative procedure to anterior cervical decompression and fusion for the treatment of cervical disk disease. The aim of the study was to perform a systematic literature review on long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after Bryan cervical disk arthroplasty.Material and Methodsː A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines via PubMed and Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library database by using the following keywords: "Bryan prosthesis"; "cervical disk arthroplasty"; "outcomes"; and "long-term follow-up." Eight articles with at least 10 years of follow-up were considered for eligibility.Resultsː In total, 481 patients were enrolled in the studies. Because of the occurrence of multiple treated levels, 588 arthroplasties were performed, divided as follows: 12 C3/4 cervical disk arthroplasties (2.01%), 63 C4/5 (10.71%), 325 C5/6 (55.27%), and 188 C6/7 (31.97%). The mean preoperative cervical lordosis was 13.6 ± 9.3°, whereas the last follow-up value was 12.8 ± 8.7°. In the last follow-up, the mean segmental range of motion was 8.2 ± 3.3°.Discussion: Recent studies have suggested that cervical disk arthroplasty should be safely performed in healthy young patients with disk degeneration who may need future revision surgery. The results suggest that this procedure preserves native cervical spinal biomechanics at long-term follow-up with acceptable adjacent segments disease and periprosthetic ossifications.Conclusionsː Cervical disk arthroplasty has good long-term device survival, motility, adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes. Therefore, it represents a valid alternative for the treatment of cervical spine degenerative pathologies, especially in young patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.