Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153443›Full record

ReviewActa neurochirurgica. Supplement2023

Tools and Modalities for Postural Ergonomics Research in Surgery and Neurosurgery.

Georgios Mavrovounis, Torstein R Meling, Jesus Lafuente, Konstantinos N Fountas, Andreas K Demetriades

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgios MavrovounisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Torstein R MelingDepartment of Neurosurgery, The National Hospital of Denmark, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesus LafuenteSpine Center, Hospital Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Konstantinos N FountasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Andreas K DemetriadesDepartment of Neurosurgery, New Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are common amongst neurosurgeons and can affect a surgeon's ability to operate. Performing surgical ergonomics research is important to minimize the prevalence and effect of WMSDs on the surgeons. The aim of this review is to highlight some of the most important objective and subjective tools available for surgical ergonomics research. Subjective tools can be divided into three categories: (1) questionnaires (either validated or non-validated) filled out by the participants, (2) survey assessments/standardized scoring systems filled out by the researchers, and (3) video analysis. Subjective tools have the drawbacks of recall bias and intra-rater and inter-rater variability. Some of the most important objective tools available are surface electromyography, force plate/pressure sensors analysis, inertial measurement units (IMUs) and kinematics data capturing using reflective markers. Although these modalities do not have the drawbacks that hinder the use of subjective tools, using most of them in the real-life operating theatre, with the exception of IMUs, is challenging. Conducting surgical ergonomics research is important to optimize the performance of neurosurgeons. The advancements towards wearable, wireless technologies will make it easier for surgeons to perform ergonomics research in the operating room.

Indexed as

NeurosurgeryWearable Electronic DevicesErgonomicsHumansNeurosurgeonsNeurosurgical ProceduresErgonomicsErgonomics researchInertial measurement unitsSurface electromyographyWork-related musculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.