Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153429›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Pelvic floor reconstruction-update 2024: prolapse-associated symptoms and their treatment].

B Liedl, M Barba, M Wenk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00638235 (A Prospective, Multi-Center Study to Assess the AMS Pelvic Floor Repair System Devices for Prolapse Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00638235 completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multi-Center Study to Assess the AMS Pelvic Floor Repair System Devices for Prolapse Repair

TypeobservationalSponsorASTORA Women's HealthRan2006 to 2012Enrolled725ConditionsPelvic Organ ProlapseArmsAMS Apogee™ with IntePro, AMS Apogee™ with Intexen LP, AMS Perigee™ with IntePro, AMS Perigee™ with IntePro Lite, AMS Apogee™ with IntePro Lite
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B LiedlZentrum für Rekonstruktive Urogenitalchirurgie, Urologische Klinik München-Planegg, Germeringer Str. 32, 82152, München-Planegg, Deutschland. drliedlbfx@googlemail.com.
M BarbaAbteilung für Urologie, Kreiskrankenhaus Ebersberg, akad. Lehrkrankenhaus der technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland.
M WenkKlinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUrologische Klinik München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and associated symptoms of urinary incontinence, fecal incontinence, obstructive micturition, defecation, and pain are frequent and a widespread disease with relevant reduction of quality of life and high costs. New insights into functional anatomy and pathophysiology of these pelvic floor dysfunctions let us recognize how ligamentous laxities/defects lead to these dysfunctions. Results of the PROpel study (ClinicalTrials.gov-Identifier: NCT00638235) are shown in which a detailed observation of symptoms (patient-related outcome measures) pre- and postoperatively was performed. Ligamentous vaginal repair of POP enables symptom cure in high percentages for urinary urge incontinence (up to 82%), nocturia (up to 92%), obstructive micturition (up to 87%), fecal incontinence (58-72%), obstructive defecation (71-84%), and pain (53-90%), if caused by POP. Women with POP‑Q stage 2 have similar symptom frequencies as women with POP‑Q stage 3-4, and also similar cure rates of their symptoms. If good anatomical prolapse repair (in responders) was achieved, the cure rates for obstructive micturition, urinary urgency incontinence, and nocturia were significantly higher than in those women with less effective surgical repair. In the future, pelvic floor surgery should have symptom cure as the primary objective and should lead to improved quality of life. The different, currently performed techniques for POP repair have to be investigated concerning this matter.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceNocturiaPelvic Organ ProlapseUrinary IncontinenceFemaleHumansPainPelvic FloorQuality of LifeFecal incontinenceObstructive MicturitionOveractive bladderPelvic organ prolapsePelvic pain

Identifiers

PMID38153429
PMCPMC10791727
OpenAlexW4390311605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.