Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38153427›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Evaluation and management of urethral strictures-guideline summary 2024 : part 1-anterior urethra].

Jakob Klemm, Roland Dahlem, Luis A Kluth, Clemens M Rosenbaum, Shahrokh F Shariat, Margit Fisch, Malte W Vetterlein, Trauma and Reconstructive Urology Working Party of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jakob KlemmKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Roland DahlemKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Luis A KluthKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Clemens M RosenbaumKlinik für Urologie, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Shahrokh F ShariatUniversitätsklinik für Urologie, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.
Margit FischKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Malte W VetterleinKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. m.vetterlein@uke.de.
Trauma and Reconstructive Urology Working Party of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists
Universität Hamburg · DEAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DECharles University · CZUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, several international urological societies have published guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of urethral strictures, but a guideline for the German-speaking region has not been available to date. This summary provides a detailed comparison of the guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU), American Urological Association (AUA) and the Société Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) with regard to the treatment of anterior urethral strictures, i.e. from the bulbar urethra to the meatus. In the following work, differences and specific recommendations in the guidelines are highlighted. In particular, the three guidelines largely agree with regard to diagnostic workup and follow-up. However, divergences exist in the management of anterior urethral strictures, particularly with regard to the use of endoscopic therapeutic approaches and the use of urethral stents. In addition, the EAU provides more comprehensive and detailed recommendations on urethroplasty techniques and specific patient follow-up. The EAU guidelines are the most current and were the first to include instructions for urethral strictures in women and individuals with gender incongruence after genital approximation surgery. Reconstructive urology is a rapidly evolving specialty and, thus, the clinical approach has been changing accordingly. Although guideline recommendations have become more inclusive and comprehensive, more high-quality data are needed to further improve the level of evidence.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresUrethral StrictureUrologyData AccuracyFemaleHumansUnited StatesUrethraEndoscopyEvidence-based medicineHypospadiasPatient-reported outcome measuresUrethroplasty

Identifiers

PMID38153427
OpenAlexW4390345878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.