Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38152810›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

The Management of Intussusception: A Systematic Review.

Majed Ali Attoun, Shuruq Mousa D Albalawi, Afnan Ayoub, Ali K Alnasser, Esraa H Alkaram, Fouz A Khubrani, Khalid J Alzahrani, Kholoud A Alatawi, Nura Almutairi, Almuhannad G Alnami

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06351163 (Minimally Invasive Surgical Management for Pediatric Intussusception), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06351163 completednot on this map

Minimally Invasive Surgical Management for Pediatric Intussusception: A Retrospective Cohort Study on the Long-Term Outcome

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Children's Hospital, VietnamRan2016 to 2024Enrolled181ConditionsIntussusceptionArmsLaparoscopic reduction, Transumbilical mini-open reduction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Majed Ali AttounDepartment of Surgery, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, SAU.
Shuruq Mousa D AlbalawiFaculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU.
Afnan AyoubFaculty of Medicine, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Ali K AlnasserFaculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, POL.
Esraa H AlkaramDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Almana Group of Hospitals (AGH), Dammam, SAU.
Fouz A KhubraniFaculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Khalid J AlzahraniDepartment of Radiology, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Kholoud A AlatawiDepartment of General Surgery, King Khalid Hospital, Tabuk, SAU.
Nura AlmutairiFaculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU.
Almuhannad G AlnamiFaculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAKing Abdulaziz University · SAKing Khalid University · SAJazan University · SAJeddah University · SAKing Khaled Hospital · SAUniversity of Tabuk · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intussusception (ISN) is a dangerous condition where a portion of the intestine slides into an adjacent area of the intestine. This telescoping motion frequently prevents liquids or food from flowing through. Developing management guidelines for ileocolic (IC) intussusception was the aim of this systematic study. Data sources were PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Embase databases. Our review investigated English-language articles (from 2010 to 2023) according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Overall, there were 15 articles. Surveys and analyses of national databases were the most widely used methods (n=15). The search identified 561 studies; 15 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Further understanding of the management of intussusception may help improve evaluation and management in the future. The use of preventive antibiotics does not reduce problems following radiologic reduction. When clinically appropriate, repeated attempts at enema reduction may be made. After the enema reduction of ileocolic intussusception, patients can be safely watched in the emergency room (ER), thereby avoiding hospitalization. Success rates for laparoscopic reduction are high. When it comes to intussusception in children who are hemodynamically stable and do not have a serious illness, there is no need for pre-reduction antibiotics. Prioritizing nonoperative outpatient (OP) therapy is recommended as the primary approach, with the utilization of minimally invasive procedures to avoid the necessity for laparotomy. The management of colonic intussusception involves complete removal in one piece, while enteric intussusception can be addressed through reduction followed by resection. A targeted approach is recommended, recognizing the intermediate forms of intussusception that may exist between the colonic and enteric types. It is essential to note that the prevailing treatment for adult intussusception remains to be surgical intervention.

Indexed as

adultchildcovid-19enemafluoroscopyintussusceptionultrasound

Identifiers

PMID38152810
PMCPMC10752083
OpenAlexW4389047903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.