ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2023
Phase-specific differential regulation of mechanical allodynia in a murine model of neuropathic pain by progesterone.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroprotective effects of Yangming-Kaixin-Yizhi formula in Alzheimer's disease: dual regulation of PI3K/Akt and p38 MAPK signaling via network pharmacology and experimental approaches.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Article
- Neurosteroids and neurological disorders.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Progesterone has been shown to have neuroprotective capabilities against a wide range of nervous system injuries, however there are negative clinical studies that have failed to demonstrate positive effects of progesterone therapy. Specifically, we looked into whether progesterone receptors or its metabolizing enzymes, cytochrome P450c17 and 5α-reductase, are involved in the effects of progesterone on neuropathic pain after chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the sciatic nerve in mice. Intrathecal progesterone administration during the induction phase of chronic pain enhanced mechanical allodynia development and spinal glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression, and this enhancement was inhibited by administration of ketoconazole, a P450c17 inhibitor, but not finasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor. Furthermore, phospho-serine levels of P450c17 in the spinal cord were elevated on day 1 after CCI operation, but not on day 17. In contrast, intrathecal progesterone administration during the maintenance phase of chronic pain decreased the acquired pain and elevated GFAP expression; this inhibition was restored by finasteride administration, but not by ketoconazole. The modification of mechanical allodynia brought on by progesterone in CCI mice was unaffected by the administration of mifepristone, a progesterone receptor antagonist. Collectively, these findings imply that progesterone suppresses spinal astrocyte activation via 5α-reductase activity during the maintenance phase of chronic pain and has an analgesic impact on the mechanical allodynia associated with the growing neuropathy. Progesterone, however, stimulates spinal astrocytes during the induction stage of peripheral neuropathy and boosts the allodynic impact caused by CCI through early spinal P450c17 activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.