Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38152683›Full record

ArticleInternational Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation2023

Step Length Is a More Reliable Measurement Than Walking Speed for Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning.

Fatemeh Elyasi, Roberto Manduchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Step Length Estimation for Blind Walkers.Computers helping people with special needs : ... International Conference, ICCHP ... : proceedings. International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatemeh ElyasiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, USA.
Roberto ManduchiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, USA.

Funding

Inertial-based indoor backtracking and wayfinding aid for blind travelersR01EY029260 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ · PI MANDUCHI, ROBERTO · 2018 to 2021
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) relies on the estimation of the length of each step taken by the walker in a path from inertial data (e.g. as recorded by a smartphone). Existing algorithms either estimate step lengths directly, or predict walking speed, which can then be integrated over a step period to obtain step length. We present an analysis, using a common architecture formed by an LSTM followed by four fully connected layers, of the quality of reconstruction when predicting step length vs. walking speed. Our experiments, conducted on a data set collected by twelve participants, strongly suggest that step length can be predicted more reliably than average walking speed over each step.

Indexed as

Pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR)Smartphone inertial dataStep length estimationWalking speed prediction

Identifiers

PMID38152683
PMCPMC10752414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.