ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2023
Mitigating Membership Inference in Deep Survival Analyses with Differential Privacy.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential privacy for medical deep learning: methods, tradeoffs, and deployment implications.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Private Continuous Survival Analysis with Distributed Multi-Site Data.Proceedings : ... IEEE International Conference on Big Data. IEEE International Conference on Big Data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks have been increasingly integrated in healthcare applications to enable accurate predicative analyses. Sharing trained deep models not only facilitates knowledge integration in collaborative research efforts but also enables equitable access to computational intelligence. However, recent studies have shown that an adversary may leverage a shared model to learn the participation of a target individual in the training set. In this work, we investigate privacy-protecting model sharing for survival studies. Specifically, we pose three research questions. (1) Do deep survival models leak membership information? (2) How effective is differential privacy in defending against membership inference in deep survival analyses? (3) Are there other effects of differential privacy on deep survival analyses? Our study assesses the membership leakage in emerging deep survival models and develops differentially private training procedures to provide rigorous privacy protection. The experimental results show that deep survival models leak membership information and our approach effectively reduces membership inference risks. The results also show that differential privacy introduces a limited performance loss, and may improve the model robustness in the presence of noisy data, compared to non-private models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.