Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38152485›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Comparison Shows that Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Identifies Infection-associated Urinary Biomarker-positive Urinary Tract Infections That Are Missed by Standard Urine Culture.

Emery Haley, Natalie Luke, Mohit Mathur, Richard A Festa, Jimin Wang, Yan Jiang, Lori Anderson, David Baunoch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emery HaleyDepartment of Clinical Research, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.
Natalie LukeDepartment of Clinical Research, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.
Mohit MathurDepartment of Medical Affairs, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.
Richard A FestaDepartment of Research and Development, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jimin WangDepartment of Statistical Analysis, Stat4Ward, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Yan JiangDepartment of Statistical Analysis, Stat4Ward, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lori AndersonL. Anderson Diagnostic Market Access Consulting, San Diego, CA, USA.
David BaunochDepartment of Research and Development, Pathnostics, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) has increased sensitivity for microbial detection compared with standard urine culture (SUC) in cases diagnosed as urinary tract infections (UTIs), leading to questions whether detected microbes are likely causative of UTIs or are incidental findings. Objective: To compare infection-associated biomarker levels against M-PCR and SUC results in symptomatic cases with a presumptive diagnosis of a UTI by a urologist. Design setting and participants: Participants were ≥60 yr old and presented to urology clinics between January and April 2023 with symptoms of UTIs ( Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Distributions were compared using two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, with two-tailed Results and limitations: In cases with M-PCR-positive/SUC-negative results ( Conclusions: A significant number of M-PCR-positive/SUC-negative cases had elevated levels of infection-related urinary biomarkers, especially when infection was caused by organisms other than Patient summary: We compared infection-associated biomarkers in patients diagnosed with urinary tract infections (UTIs) against the detection of microorganisms by standard urine culture (SUC) and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR). We found that most patients with microorganisms detected by M-PCR, which were missed by SUC, had elevated markers of inflammation, indicating that these organisms were likely causative of UTIs.

Indexed as

Diagnostic testingFalse negative urine cultureMultiplex polymerase chain reactionStandard urine cultureUrinary tract infectionUrine biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38152485
PMCPMC10751541
OpenAlexW4388510159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.