ArticleEuropean urology open science2023
Patient Perspectives on Kidney Stone Surgery: A Content Analysis of Instagram Posts by Patients Versus Surgeons.
Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Italian-translated EAU video for informed consent in PCNL: enhancing patient understanding and reducing anxiety: a prospective two-centre study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Is "Open Stone Surgery with Intraoperative Nephroscopy" a Better Alternative to Percutaneous Stone Removal for Complex Kidney Stones in Resource-Constrained Rural Settings?: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
- Patient consent in the modern era: Novel tools and practical considerations in urology.Current urology · 2025Article
- Unraveling Online Perspectives and Misinformation Surrounding Urinary Tract Infections: A Thematic Analysis of 1200 Instagram Posts.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
- Social Media in Urologic Healthcare: Transforming Treatment, Management, and Online Medical Communication.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Social Media Perspectives on Clavicle Fractures: A Content Analysis of Instagram Posts From Patients and Surgeons.Cureus · 2025Article
- Latarjet and Bankart Repairs: Instagram-Based Perception Analysis Shows Comparable Patient Experiences.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.Central European journal of urology · 2025Article
- Social media and urology: The good, the bad and the ugly.Urologia · 2024Review
- Patient perspectives on vasectomy: findings from a TikTok® content analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Patient experiences and perceptions of kidney stone surgery: what lessons can be learned from TikTok?Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both clinicians and patients use social media to post about health care issues such as kidney stone disease, but their perspectives may differ. Objective: To evaluate content and themes regarding kidney stone surgery shared by patients and urologists on Instagram. Design setting and participants: A search was performed on Instagram using the term "kidney stone surgery". The first 100 posts from individuals who were clearly identified as a patient were assessed. We also assessed 100 posts from self-identified urologists. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: A previously published system was applied as a framework for categorizing the information collected. Outcomes of interested included pain, recovery, and costs. Results and limitations: Some 71% of the patients were female and most of their posts (52%) were shared postoperatively. The most common themes covered in patient posts were the need for multiple operative sessions (45%), pain (43%), and recovery (42%). Other themes included activities of daily life (18%), return to work (11%), nervousness (16%), stent issues (31%), stent on a string (5%), diet and prevention (9%), gratitude for health care services (10%), disease recurrence (18%), and costs (10%). Some 94% of the urologists were male and their posts covered the following domains: recovery (11%), stent issues (3%), pain (1%), stent on a string (1%), gratitude for health care services (1%), and recurrence 1%. Among the posts from urologists, 79% included self-promotion and 52% covered new technology. Overall, 10% contained false information. The majority of the posts with surgical images had no clear statement regarding patient consent (97%). Conclusions: Kidney stone surgery can affect many areas of a patient's quality of life. Most of the posts shared by patients were negative. Posts shared by urologists do not reflect the same themes. Moreover, there appears to be poor adherence to European Association of Urology recommendations regarding online professional conduct. Patient summary: Many patients use social media to share their experiences of kidney stone surgery. Posts are largely related to quality-of-life issues and are mostly negative. While urologists also use social media, the content they post on professional accounts is mostly focused on new technology and career promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.