ArticleVeterinary world2023
Epidemiological analysis of anaplasmosis in cattle from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Article in Veterinary world, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular epidemiology, symptomatic analysis of anaplasmosis and associated study of milk reduction in cattle from district Nowshera, KP, Pakistan.Irish veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Significance of molecular and zymography profiling for accurate detection of infected sheep with Anaplasma marginale in South Sinai, Egypt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reproductive Diseases Are Key Determinants Influencing the Success of Embryo Transfer and Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination in Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- In Vitro Detection of Acaricide Resistance in Hyalomma Species Ticks with Emphasis on Farm Management Practices Associated with Acaricide Resistance in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Prevalence of bluetongue virus disease in a small ruminant population in Kalat, Balochistan, Pakistan.Veterinary world · 2024Article
- Prevalence of trypanosomiasis caused byVeterinary world · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Anaplasmosis, a tick-borne disease affecting livestock caused by the bacteria Materials and Methods: This study used 197 cattle exhibiting clinical symptoms of anaplasmosis in natural settings. Microscopic examination was used to estimate the prevalence. Potential risk factors, such as sampling regions and months, gender, breed, and age were studied. Results: The study revealed an overall anaplasmosis prevalence of 19.79%. Bannu district exhibited a higher occurrence at 22.10%, compared to Lakki Marwat district at 17.64%. Young cattle (<2 years) demonstrated a notably higher incidence of anaplasmosis (26.78%) compared to adults (>5 years), which had a prevalence of 12.35% (p < 0.05). Female cattle (22.36%) were more susceptible than male cattle (11.11%). Prevalence peaked in June (45.71%) and was lowest in February (3.57%). Crossbred cattle had a higher prevalence (23.52%) than purebred cattle (11.47%). Conclusion: Anaplasmosis can be effectively controlled using a comprehensive approach encompassing selective breeding for resilience, targeted care of young calves and females, effective tick control during warmer months, consistent use of insecticides, and proactive risk factor management. Raising awareness among farmers through diverse channels, including media, is pivotal to bolster tick-borne disease management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.