ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Successful β-blocker introduction under intra-aortic balloon pumping and ivabradine in a patient with new-onset dilated cardiomyopathy and pulsus alternans: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulsus alternans has been considered a sign of poor prognosis in patients undergoing treatments for heart failure. However, it may be overlooked in patients with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs). The use of IABP and ivabradine for a β-blocker introduction in a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and pulsus alternans and its consequence have never been reported. Case summary: In a 16-year-old high school boy with idiopathic DCM [left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVDd), 72 mm; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 18%], the introduction of carvedilol therapy failed, causing cardiogenic shock under inotropes. Therefore, an IABP support was provided, and he was transferred to our hospital. The arterial pressure waveform under IABP demonstrated pulsus alternans with sinus tachycardia at 135/min. Ivabradine reduced the heart rate to ∼100/min and eliminated the pulsus alternans neither decreasing the cardiac index nor increasing the pulmonary artery wedge pressure. Subsequently, carvedilol was reintroduced, and IABP and inotropes were discontinued. Then, 112 days after his transfer to our hospital, left ventricular reverse remodelling was confirmed (LVDd, 54 mm; LVEF, 44%), and he returned to school. The carvedilol dose reached 20 mg/day in 4 months after discharge, and further improvement was observed a year after discharge (LVDd, 54 mm; LVEF, 52%). Discussion: Pulsus alternans is considered a predictor of poor prognosis. However, IABP and ivabradine may stabilize the haemodynamics in pulsus alternans, leading to a successful β-blocker introduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.