ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023
Guideline for the management of myasthenic syndromes.
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 114 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Healthcare costs and burden of myasthenia gravis for patients and society: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Tenth Special Issue.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Guideline
- Myasthenia gravis and pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Myasthenia Gravis With Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies in the Very Old: Treatment Challenges and Diagnostic Pitfalls.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Network connectivity, between-study heterogeneity and timepoint challenges in generalized myasthenia gravis: a feasibility assessment of indirect treatment comparisons.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical effectiveness of efgartigimod in a broad population of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: subgroup analyses from a randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled, phase 3 trial (ADAPT).Journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of Sustained Disease Control With Nipocalimab Versus Placebo in the Phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Improvement in Patient-Reported Symptoms of Generalised Myasthenia Gravis With Rozanolixizumab in the Randomised Phase 3 MycarinG Study Using the MG Symptoms PRO.European journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Changes in corticosteroid and non-steroidal immunosuppressive therapy with long-term zilucoplan treatment in generalized myasthenia gravis.Journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in Adults With Anti-Acetylcholine Receptor Antibody-Positive Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Final Results From the Phase 3 CHAMPION MG Open-Label Extension.European journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Very late-onset myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical severity and long-term outcomes.European geriatric medicine · 2026Review
- Real-world Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis in the United States.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Disease severity as the dominant clinic-available marker of myasthenic crisis occurrence: a single-centre retrospective study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Rozanolixizumab with Efgartigimod or Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Using Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparisons.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Zilucoplan Versus Intravenous Immunoglobulin, Eculizumab, and Ravulizumab Using Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Practical Guidance on Initiating and Switching Targeted Immunotherapies in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis: A German-Austrian Expert Opinion Paper.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Extended Preoperative Immunotherapy Duration Reduces the Risk of Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbation for Patients with Thymoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Predictive Factors for Non-response to First Use of Polyvalent Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Treatment Characteristics and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Initiating Rozanolixizumab: A US Claims Database Analysis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Care Goals in Myasthenia Gravis: Expert Consensus Recommendations Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2026Review
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) represent an etiologically heterogeneous group of (very) rare chronic diseases. MG and LEMS have an autoimmune-mediated etiology, while CMS are genetic disorders. A (strain dependent) muscle weakness due to neuromuscular transmission disorder is a common feature. Generalized MG requires increasingly differentiated therapeutic strategies that consider the enormous therapeutic developments of recent years. To include the newest therapy recommendations, a comprehensive update of the available German-language guideline 'Diagnostics and therapy of myasthenic syndromes' has been published by the German Neurological society with the aid of an interdisciplinary expert panel. This paper is an adapted translation of the updated and partly newly developed treatment guideline. It defines the rapid achievement of complete disease control in myasthenic patients as a central treatment goal. The use of standard therapies, as well as modern immunotherapeutics, is subject to a staged regimen that takes into account autoantibody status and disease activity. With the advent of modern, fast-acting immunomodulators, disease activity assessment has become pivotal and requires evaluation of the clinical course, including severity and required therapies. Applying MG-specific scores and classifications such as Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America allows differentiation between mild/moderate and (highly) active (including refractory) disease. Therapy decisions must consider age, thymic pathology, antibody status, and disease activity. Glucocorticosteroids and the classical immunosuppressants (primarily azathioprine) are the basic immunotherapeutics to treat mild/moderate to (highly) active generalized MG/young MG and ocular MG. Thymectomy is indicated as a treatment for thymoma-associated MG and generalized MG with acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-positive status. In (highly) active generalized MG, complement inhibitors (currently eculizumab and ravulizumab) or neonatal Fc receptor modulators (currently efgartigimod) are recommended for AChR-Ab-positive status and rituximab for muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-Ab-positive status. Specific treatment for myasthenic crises requires plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, or IVIG. Specific aspects of ocular, juvenile, and congenital myasthenia are highlighted. The guideline will be further developed based on new study results for other immunomodulators and biomarkers that aid the accurate measurement of disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.