Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151697›Full record

ReviewMolecular diversity2024

Deep learning algorithms applied to computational chemistry.

Abimael Guzman-Pando, Graciela Ramirez-Alonso, Carlos Arzate-Quintana, Javier Camarillo-Cisneros

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predicting SJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abimael Guzman-PandoComputational Chemistry Physics Laboratory, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Campus II, 31125, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Graciela Ramirez-AlonsoFaculty of Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Campus II, 31125, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Carlos Arzate-QuintanaComputational Chemistry Physics Laboratory, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Campus II, 31125, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Javier Camarillo-CisnerosComputational Chemistry Physics Laboratory, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Campus II, 31125, Chihuahua, Mexico. javier.camarillo@uach.mx.

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CONACYT CdF-2019/1311317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, there has been a significant increase in the use of deep learning techniques in the molecular sciences, which have shown high performance on datasets and the ability to generalize across data. However, no model has achieved perfect performance in solving all problems, and the pros and cons of each approach remain unclear to those new to the field. Therefore, this paper aims to review deep learning algorithms that have been applied to solve molecular challenges in computational chemistry. We proposed a comprehensive categorization that encompasses two primary approaches; conventional deep learning and geometric deep learning models. This classification takes into account the distinct techniques employed by the algorithms within each approach. We present an up-to-date analysis of these algorithms, emphasizing their key features and open issues. This includes details of input descriptors, datasets used, open-source code availability, task solutions, and actual research applications, focusing on general applications rather than specific ones such as drug discovery. Furthermore, our report discusses trends and future directions in molecular algorithm design, including the input descriptors used for each deep learning model, GPU usage, training and forward processing time, model parameters, the most commonly used datasets, libraries, and optimization schemes. This information aids in identifying the most suitable algorithms for a given task. It also serves as a reference for the datasets and input data frequently used for each algorithm technique. In addition, it provides insights into the benefits and open issues of each technique, and supports the development of novel computational chemistry systems.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational ChemistryDeep LearningDrug DiscoveryArtificial IntelligentDeep learningGraph representationMolecular Design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.