Discrepancies among equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate for drug dosing decision making in aged patients: a cross sectional study.

backgroundPatients often require adjustments to drug doses due to impaired renal function. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation using various equations can result in discrepancies, potentially leading to different dose adjustment recommendations.

aimTo determine the clinical significance of discrepancies observed between different equations used to estimate GFR for drug dose adjustments in a real-world group of patients over 65 years in primary care.

methodThe Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Berlin Initiative Study 1 equations were applied to estimate GFR in a group of patients over 65 years old attending a primary care center. Results were compared using Bland-Altman plots, and limits of agreement (LoA) and overall bias were calculated. Regression analyses were conducted to identify the null difference GFR and the slope of differences for each pairwise comparison.

resultsA total of 1886 patients were analyzed. Differences between patient-adjusted and body surface area (BSA)-normalized versions of the equations were not clinically relevant for dose adjustments, with LoAs below 20 mL/min. However, discrepancies among the original versions of several equations presented LoAs over 30 mL/min. Greater differences were found between CG and MDRD or CKD-EPI equations.

conclusionClinically relevant differences in GFR estimation were observed among different equations, potentially impacting drug dose adjustments. However, discrepancies were not considered significant when comparing patient-adjusted and BSA-normalized versions of the equations, particularly for patients with BSA close to the average.