Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151685›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2024

Conversation coaching in dementia: a feasibility study.

Suzanna Dooley, Sophie Furey, Shane O'Hanlon, Margaret Walshe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suzanna DooleyDepartment of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin and Clinical Specialist Speech and Language Therapist, HSE-IEHG, St. Columcille's Hospital, Loughlinstown, Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Sophie FureyDepartment of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin and Clinical Specialist Speech and Language Therapist, HSE-IEHG, St. Columcille's Hospital, Loughlinstown, Co. Dublin, Ireland.
Shane O'HanlonDepartment of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin and Clinical Specialist Speech and Language Therapist, HSE-IEHG, St. Columcille's Hospital, Loughlinstown, Co. Dublin, Ireland. shaneohanlon@svhg.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9270-2768
Margaret WalsheDepartment of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin and Clinical Specialist Speech and Language Therapist, HSE-IEHG, St. Columcille's Hospital, Loughlinstown, Co. Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConversation abilities of people with dementia are impacted by cognitive-communication deficits. Communication interventions can improve quality of life by increasing positive interactions and well-being. This study evaluates the feasibility of a conversation coaching intervention for people with dementia and their communication partners.

methodA mixed-method design was used. Thirty-four people were recruited over 12 months; 17 people with dementia and 17 communication partners. Participants with dementia were aged between 62 and 79 years (8 females, 9 males) and the communication partners were aged 33-77 years (5 males, 12 females). This conversation coaching intervention involved two assessment sessions (pre and post intervention) and 6 weekly sessions, alternating between individual and group-based sessions. These were facilitated by two experienced speech and language therapists with a three-month follow-up period. Participants were assessed initially and three months following intervention using Profiling Communication Ability in Dementia (P-CAD), Goal Attainment Scaling, and Capability Index for Older people (ICECAP-O).

resultsTwenty-eight participants completed the conversation coaching intervention. P-CAD scores for people with dementia were maintained at three months for 71% (n = 10) showing no decline in function and 29% (n = 4) showed improvement. Using the Goal Attainment Scaling, all people with dementia and their communication partners reported that this conversation coaching intervention helped them achieve their individual communication goals. Ten (71%) people with dementia rated their well-being as higher on the ICE-CAP-O following intervention with 29% (n = 4) rating no change in well-being from initial assessment. Over three-quarters of communication partners, (79%: n = 11), reported an increased sense of well-being following intervention and 21% (n = 3) had no change in well-being.

conclusionsPreliminary outcomes including participant feedback indicate that this conversation coaching intervention is feasible for people with dementia. The communication function and well-being of people with dementia were either maintained or improved. Conversation coaching intervention is collaborative and enhances the retained communication abilities of people living with dementia.

Indexed as

DementiaMentoringAgedCommunicationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeCognitive communicationCommunication interventionCommunication partnersDementiaEmentia education

Identifiers

PMID38151685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.