Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151671›Full record

ReviewArchives of dermatological research2023

Applications of propolis-based materials in wound healing.

Mohamed El-Sakhawy, Ahmed Salama, Hebat-Allah S Tohamy

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed El-SakhawyCellulose and Paper Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, P.O. 12622, Giza, Egypt. mm.el-sakhawy@nrc.sci.eg.
Ahmed SalamaCellulose and Paper Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, P.O. 12622, Giza, Egypt.
Hebat-Allah S TohamyCellulose and Paper Department, National Research Centre, 33 El Bohouth St., Dokki, P.O. 12622, Giza, Egypt.
National Research Centre · EG

Funding

National Research Centre, Egypt 12020101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its excellent antiseptic efficacy and antimicrobial properties, propolis has shown attractive advantages in wound dressings. However, an inclusive review of the propolis-based materials as a wound dressing is still lacking. The current short review summarizes the skin wound healing process, relates evaluation parameters, and then reviews the refined propolis-based materials dressings such as antimicrobial property, adhesion and hemostasis, anti-inflammatory and substance delivery. The approaches implemented to achieve these functions are classified and discussed. Furthermore, applications of propolis wound dressing for treating different types of wounds such as heal wounds, burns, and ulcers are presented. The future directions of propolis-based wound dressings for wound healing are further proposed. This review showed that propolis-based materials might be a promising new dressing for wound occlusion and tissue repairing.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBurnsPropolisBandagesHumansWound HealingAnti-Infective AgentsPropolisCompositePropolisWound healing

Identifiers

PMID38151671
PMCPMC10752841
OpenAlexW4390263815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.