ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Determining the Mechanical Properties of Super-Elastic Nitinol Bone Staples Through an Integrated Experimental and Computational Calibration Approach.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative finite element modelling of surgical meshes at macro and mesoscale: assessing the role of morphology on mechanical behavior.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Super-elastic bone staples have emerged as a safe and effective alternative for internal fixation. Nevertheless, several biomechanical aspects of super-elastic staples are still unclear and require further exploration. Within this context, this study presents a combined experimental and computational approach to investigate the mechanical characteristics of super-elastic staples. Two commercially available staples with distinct geometry, characterized by two and four legs, respectively, were examined. Experimental four-point bending tests were conducted to evaluate staple performance in terms of generated forces. Subsequently, a finite element-based calibration procedure was developed to capture the unique super-elastic behavior of the staple materials. Finally, a virtual bench testing framework was implemented to separate the effect of geometry from that of the material characteristics on the mechanical properties of the devices, including generated force, strain distribution, and fatigue behavior. The experimental tests indicated differences in the force vs. displacement curves between staples. The material calibration procedure revealed marked differences in the super-elastic properties of the materials employed in staple 1 and staple 2. The results obtained from the virtual bench testing framework have showed that both geometric features and material characteristics had a substantial impact on the mechanical properties of the device, especially on the generated force, whereas their effect on strain distribution and fatigue behavior was comparatively less pronounced. To conclude, this study advances the biomechanical understanding of Nitinol super-elastic staples by separately investigating the impact of geometry and material characteristics on the mechanical properties of two commercially available devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.