Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151636›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Moderate sagittal plane deformity patients have similar radiographic and functional outcomes with either anterior or posterior surgery.

Anton Denisov, Andrea Rowland, Nikita Zaborovskii, Dmitrii Ptashnikov, Dimitriy Kondrashov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anton DenisovHospital Quironsalud San Jose, Madrid, Spain.
Andrea RowlandSan Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program and St. Mary's Medical Center, 450 Stanyan St., San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA. andreanrowland@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-6195
Nikita ZaborovskiiVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Dmitrii PtashnikovVreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Dimitriy KondrashovSan Francisco Orthopaedic Residency Program and St. Mary's Medical Center, 450 Stanyan St., San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA.
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESRussian Scientific Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after R.R. Vreden · RUSt. Mary's Medical Center · USSt. Mary's Medical Center · USSt Petersburg University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of two surgical interventions for adult spinal deformity (ASD): anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior column realignment (ALIF-ACR) and posterior approach using Smith-Peterson osteotomy with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation (TLIF-Schwab2).

methodsA retrospective cohort study included 61 ASD patients treated surgically between 2019 and 2020 at a single tertiary orthopedic specialty hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (ALIF-ACR, 29 patients) and Group 2 (TLIF-Schwab2, 32 patients). Spinopelvic radiographic parameters and functional outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery.

resultsPerioperative outcomes favored the ALIF-ACR group, with significantly smaller blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and operative time. Radiographic and functional outcomes were similar for both groups; however, the ALIF-ACR group did have a greater degree of correction in lumbar lordosis at 12 months. Complication profiles varied, with the ALIF-ACR group experiencing mostly hardware-related complications, while the TLIF-Schwab2 group faced dural tears, wound dehiscence, and proximal junctional kyphosis. Both groups had similar revision rates.

conclusionBoth ALIF-ACR and TLIF-Schwab2 achieved similar radiographic and functional outcomes in ASD patients with moderate sagittal plane deformity at 1-year follow-up. However, the safety profiles of the two techniques differed. Further research is required to optimize patient selection for each surgical approach, aiming to minimize perioperative complications and reoperation rates in this challenging patient population.

Indexed as

KyphosisSpinal FusionAdultAnimalsHeadHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesACRAdult spinal deformityALIFPonte osteotomySmith–Petersen osteotomySurgical outcomeTLIF

Identifiers

PMID38151636
OpenAlexW4390263854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.