ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2024
Quantification of extravasation and binding of PSMA-targeted nanobubbles by modelling the second-wave phenomenon.
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWith about ten-fold smaller diameter than MBs, nanobubbles (NBs) were developed as new-generation ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) able to extravasate and target specific receptors expressed on extravascular cancer cells, such as the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). It has been shown that PSMA-targeted NBs (PSMA-NBs) can bind to specific prostate cancer (PCa) cells and exhibit a prolonged retention effect (PRE), observable by NB-based CEUS (NB-CEUS). However, previous analyses of PRE were mainly limited to the semi-quantitative assessment of the time-intensity curve (TIC) in an entire tumor ROI, possibly losing information on tumor spatial heterogeneity and local characteristics. When analyzing the pixel-level TICs of free NB-based CEUS, we observed a unique second-wave phenomenon: The first pass of the NB wave (bolus) is usually accompanied by a second wave in the time range of 3 to 15 min after the bolus injection. Such a phenomenon was shown to be potentially valuable in supporting the diagnostics of cancerous lesions. PROCEDURES: Seven male athymic nude mice were included and implanted with a tumor expressing PSMA (PSMA+) and tumors not expressing PSMA (PSMA-) on two flanks. Using either free NBs or PSMA-NBs, the characteristics of pixel-level TICs were estimated by a specialized model accounting for the two-wave phenomenon, compared with a conventional model describing only one wave. The estimated parameters by the two models were presented as parametric maps to visualize the PRE of PSMA-NBs in a dual-tumor mouse model. The effectiveness of the two models were also assessed by comparing the estimated parameters in the PSMA+ and PSMA- tumors through Mann-Whitney U test and quartile difference.
resultsTwo parameters, the peak time and residual factor of the second wave, by the second-wave model were significantly different between PSMA+ and PSMA- tumors when using PSMA-NBs. Compared with the TICs of free NBs, TICs of PSMA-NBs present higher peak intensity and a more delayed second wave, especially in the PSMA+ tumor.
conclusionsThe estimation of parametric maps allows the estimation and visualization of specific binding of PSMA-NBs in PCa. The incorporation of the second-wave phenomenon enrich our understanding of NB kinetics in vivo and can possibly contribute to improved diagnostics of PCa in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.