ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Development of cystoid macular edema after uneventful cataract surgery in eyes with a history of vitrectomy using silicone oil versus gas tamponade.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications of silicone oil in vitreoretinal surgery: a narrative review of clinical and experimental evidence.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Review
- Review
- Risk Factors and Management of Intraocular Pressure Elevation After Vitrectomy Combined with Silicone Oil Tamponade.International journal of general medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe purpose of this study is to investigate whether history of silicone oil tamponade may predispose to the development of cystoid macular edema (CMO) following uneventful post-vitrectomy cataract surgery. SUBJECTS/
methodsThis is a retrospective study that was conducted at a single academic institution. Records of patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with or without silicone oil tamponade and subsequent cataract surgery between 2017-2020 were reviewed. Macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings up to 4 years after surgery were assessed.
resultsA total of 95 eyes were included. Forty-one eyes underwent cataract surgery and had a history of PPV with silicone oil tamponade (Group 1). Fifty-four eyes underwent cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and had a history of PPV with gas tamponade (Group 2). Average follow up time after cataract surgery was 41.1 months. In Group 1, the incidence of OCT-detected CMO was 39.0%, compared to 27.8% in Group 2 (p = 0.247). The incidence of clinically significant CMO in Group 1 was 22.0%, compared to 18.5% in Group 2 (p = 0.679). The duration of CMO was significantly longer in Group 1 (p = 0.041) and cases were less likely to resolve by the last follow up visit (p = 0.040).
conclusionsThe incidence of OCT-detected or clinically significant pseudophakic CMO is not significantly different between eyes with prior PPV with gas tamponade versus silicone oil tamponade. However, CMO after uneventful cataract surgery may have a prolonged course if there is history of silicone oil tamponade, requiring longer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.