Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151487›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Assessing the cyclic fatigue resistance and sterilization effects on replica-like endodontic instruments compared to Reciproc Blue.

Fernando Antonio Siano Dos Reis, Amjad Abu Hasna, Gustavo Ragozzini, Felipe Bernardo de Moura, Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos, Alexandre Sigrist de Martin, Cláudio Antonio Talge Carvalho, Carlos Eduardo Silveira Bueno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PeerJ · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando Antonio Siano Dos ReisFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Endodontia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-3135-3067
Amjad Abu HasnaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo Avenue 777, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil. d.d.s.amjad@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1112-985X
Gustavo RagozziniFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Endodontia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0007-4012-2829
Felipe Bernardo de MouraDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo Avenue 777, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.
Tiago Moreira Bastos CamposPhysics Department, Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Alexandre Sigrist de MartinFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Endodontia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3320-9172
Cláudio Antonio Talge CarvalhoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Endodontics Division, Institute of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo Avenue 777, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP 12245-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0987-5594
Carlos Eduardo Silveira BuenoFaculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Instituto de Pesquisas São Leopoldo Mandic, Endodontia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-0884
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica · BRUniversidad de Especialidades Espíritu Santo · EC

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the number of uses and autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of four replica-like instruments RC Blue; Only One File Blue; Recip One Blue; and Micro Blue compared to the original system Reciproc Blue (VDW, Munich, Germany). The instruments were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) before being used in root canal instrumentation (baseline). Fifty molars were instrumented by ten instruments (n=10). After sterilization in an autoclave, the  instruments were analyzed by SEM. This procedure was repeated twice more using different molars, totaling 3 rounds of instrumentation, sterilization and SEM analysis. Then, ten different instruments from each brand were tested for cyclic fatigue resistance. Number of uses data were analyzed using Chi-squared analysis, and cyclic fatigue data were analyzed by one-way Anova followed by Tukey's test as the data had normal distribution. The fracture times for all systems had no significant difference, but Micro Blue had significantly lower values than the other systems (p < 0.05). The SEM analysis showed distortions in the instruments after the 3rd use. Therefore, all tested instruments except of Micro Blue have similar resistance to cyclic fatigue, and all are reliable for use in up to 2-cases.

Indexed as

Root Canal PreparationSterilizationEquipment DesignEquipment FailureMaterials TestingStress, MechanicalTitaniumTitanium

Identifiers

PMID38151487
PMCPMC10752872
OpenAlexW4390274067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.