Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151483›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2024

Effects of rurality and distance to care on perinatal outcomes over a 1-year period during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pratyusha V Bujimalla, Kimberly A Kenne, Haley A Steffen, Samantha R Swartz, Linder H Wendt, Adam M Skibbe, J Brooks Jackson, Mary B Rysavy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pratyusha V BujimallaUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Kimberly A KenneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2324-8266
Haley A SteffenUniversity of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Samantha R SwartzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Linder H WendtInstitute of Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Adam M SkibbeDepartment of Geographical and Sustainability Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Brooks JacksonDepartment of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Mary B RysavyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-5746
University of Iowa · US

Funding

The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR002537 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HANSEN, MARLAN R, WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2018 to 2022
$20.0M
Mark Gilbert and Karen Simmonds Research Gift FundNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002537NIH HHS UL1TR002537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to investigate the roles of rurality and distance to care on adverse perinatal outcomes and COVID-19 seroprevalence at the time of delivery over a 1-year period.

methodsData were collected from the electronic medical record on all pregnant patients who delivered at a single, large, Midwest academic medical center over 1 year. Rurality was classified using standard Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes. Geographic Information System tools were used to map outcomes. Data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate models, controlling for Body Mass Index (BMI), insurance status, and parity.

findingsA total of 2,497 patients delivered during the study period; 20% of patients were rural (n = 499), 18.6% were micropolitan (n = 466), and 61.4% were metropolitan (n = 1,532). 10.4% of patients (n = 259) were COVID-19 seropositive. Rural patients did not experience higher rates of any measured adverse outcomes than metropolitan patients; micropolitan patients had increased odds of preterm labor (OR = 1.41, P = .022) and pre-eclampsia (OR = 1.78, P<.001). Patients living 30+ miles away from the medical center had increased odds of preterm labor (OR = 1.94, P<.001), pre-eclampsia (OR = 1.73, P = .002), and infant admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (OR = 2.12, P<.001), as well as lower gestational age at delivery (β = -9.2 days, P<.001) and birth weight (β = -206 grams, P<.001).

conclusionDistance to care, rather than rurality, was the key predictor of multiple adverse perinatal outcomes in this cohort of deliveries over a 1-year period. Our study suggests that rurality should not be used as a standalone indicator of access to care without further knowledge of the specific barriers affecting a given population.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersCOVID-19Health Services AccessibilityPerinatal CareRural PopulationAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansIowaPostpartum HemorrhagePre-EclampsiaPregnancyPremature BirthSeroepidemiologic Studiesadverse perinatal outcomesCOVID‐19rurality

Identifiers

PMID38151483
PMCPMC11186728
OpenAlexW4390297456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.