Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151331›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2024

The Ecology of Hybrid Incompatibilities.

Ken A Thompson, Yaniv Brandvain, Jenn M Coughlan, Kira E Delmore, Hannah Justen, Catherine R Linnen, Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos, Catherine A Rushworth, Hilde Schneemann, Molly Schumer and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genetics and genomics of hybridization.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A species interaction kick-starts ecological speciation in allopatry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Ken A ThompsonDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA kthomp1063@gmail.com.
Yaniv BrandvainDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA.
Jenn M CoughlanDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA.
Kira E DelmoreDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Hannah JustenDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Catherine R LinnenDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506, USA.
Daniel Ortiz-BarrientosSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Catherine A RushworthDepartment of Biology and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322, USA.
Hilde SchneemannDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, United Kingdom.
Molly SchumerDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Rike StelkensDivision of Population Genetics, Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Texas A&M University · USARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture · AUCarnegie Institution for Science · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USStockholm University · SEUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUtah State University · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecologically mediated selection against hybrids, caused by hybrid phenotypes fitting poorly into available niches, is typically viewed as distinct from selection caused by epistatic Dobzhansky-Muller hybrid incompatibilities. Here, we show how selection against transgressive phenotypes in hybrids manifests as incompatibility. After outlining our logic, we summarize current approaches for studying ecology-based selection on hybrids. We then quantitatively review QTL-mapping studies and find traits differing between parent taxa are typically polygenic. Next, we describe how verbal models of selection on hybrids translate to phenotypic and genetic fitness landscapes, highlighting emerging approaches for detecting polygenic incompatibilities. Finally, in a synthesis of published data, we report that trait transgression-and thus possibly extrinsic hybrid incompatibility in hybrids-escalates with the phenotypic divergence between parents. We discuss conceptual implications and conclude that studying the ecological basis of hybrid incompatibility will facilitate new discoveries about mechanisms of speciation.

Indexed as

Hybridization, GeneticPhenotypeAnimalsEcologyGenetic FitnessGenetic SpeciationQuantitative Trait LociSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID38151331
PMCPMC11368197
OpenAlexW4390265515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.