Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38151273›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Exploration of pain assessment and management processes in oncology outpatient services with healthcare professionals: a qualitative study.

Olivia C Robinson, Simon Pini, Kate Flemming, Natasha Campling, Marie Fallon, Suzanne H Richards, Catriona R Mayland, Elaine Boland, Daniel Swinson, Adam Hurlow and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Challenges in Cancer Pain Assessment.The Ulster medical journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuropathic Pain in Cancer: What Are the Current Guidelines?Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia C RobinsonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK o.c.robinson@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3171-4407
Simon PiniPsychological and Social Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Kate FlemmingHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Natasha CamplingSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, UK.
Marie FallonMRC Institute of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Suzanne H RichardsLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Catriona R MaylandDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Elaine BolandPalliative Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Daniel SwinsonSt. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Adam HurlowPalliative Care Team, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6064-9686
Sue HartupSt. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Matthew R MulveyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6357-3848
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBInstitute of Genetics and Cancer · GBUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study explored cancer pain management practices and clinical care pathways used by healthcare professionals (HCPs) to understand the barriers and facilitators for standardised pain management in oncology outpatient services (OS).

designData were collected using semistructured interviews that were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.

settingThree NHS trusts with oncology OS in Northern England.

participantsTwenty HCPs with varied roles (eg, oncologist and nurse) and experiences (eg, registrar and consultant) from different cancer site clinics (eg, breast and lung). Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsHCPs discussed cancer pain management practices during consultation and supporting continuity of care beyond consultation. Key findings included : (1) HCPs' level of clinical experience influenced pain assessments; (2) remote consulting impeded experienced HCPs to do detailed pain assessments; (3) diffusion of HCP responsibility to manage cancer pain; (4) nurses facilitated pain management support with patients and (5) continuity of care for pain management was constrained by the integration of multidisciplinary teams.

conclusionsThese data demonstrate HCP cancer pain management practices varied and were unstructured. Recommendations are made for a standardised cancer pain management intervention: (1) detailed evaluation of pain with a tailored self-management strategy; (2) implementation of a structured pain assessment that supports remote consultations, (3) pain assessment tool that can support both experienced and less experienced clinicians. These findings will inform the development of a cancer pain management tool to integrate within routine oncology OS.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelNeoplasmsAmbulatory CareDelivery of Health CareHumansPainPain MeasurementQualitative ResearchAdult oncologyCancer painQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID38151273
PMCPMC10753735
OpenAlexW4390277332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.