Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150995›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2024

Case study: Gait assessment of a patient with hallux rigidus before and after plantar modification.

Roberto Tedeschi

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberto TedeschiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: roberto.tedeschi2@unibo.it.
University of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and importanceHallux rigidus (HR) is a degenerative arthritis affecting the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP), leading to pain and functional impairment, particularly during the propulsive phase of walking. The prevalence of HR is about 2.5 % in individuals over 50, but younger individuals can also be affected, as demonstrated in this case. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 26-year-old patient with a body mass index (BMI) of 20.2, who has been suffering from HR for 5 years. The patient presented with walking difficulties, characterized by a limp and impaired propulsion phase, and pain in the right foot due to HR. A comprehensive gait assessment was conducted using a baropodometric platform and integrated smartphone motion sensors. Following the diagnosis, a non-surgical intervention involving the application of a compressed cotton felt foot orthosis at the MTP plantar area was initiated. This intervention aimed to alleviate pain and improve the functional mobility of the right big toe. Post-treatment assessments showed an increase in the big toe's mobility from 0 degrees to 35 degrees, as measured by a digital goniometer. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: The application of a soft support, such as compressed cotton felt, at the plantar area of MTP, demonstrated a potential non-surgical therapeutic approach to improve gait and reduce discomfort in HR patients.

conclusionThis case study underscores the potential benefits of plantar modification in the management of HR.

Indexed as

Baropodometric examinationCase reportHallux limitusInsoleMotion sensors

Identifiers

PMID38150995
PMCPMC10800719
OpenAlexW4390165478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.