Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150729›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024

Susceptibility of Anopheles gambiae to Natural Plasmodium falciparum Infection: A Comparison between the Well-Established Anopheles gambiae s.s Line and a Newly Established Ugandan Anopheles gambiae s.s. Line.

Daniel Ayo, Ismail Onyige, Joseph Okoth, Eric Musasizi, Ambrose Oruni, Jordache Ramjith, Emmanuel Arinaitwe, John C Rek, Chris Drakeley, Sarah G Staedke and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniel AyoInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Nagongera Hospital, Tororo, Uganda.
Ismail OnyigeInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Nagongera Hospital, Tororo, Uganda.
Joseph OkothInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Nagongera Hospital, Tororo, Uganda.
Eric MusasiziInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Nagongera Hospital, Tororo, Uganda.
Ambrose OruniDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jordache RamjithDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Emmanuel ArinaitweInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Nagongera Hospital, Tororo, Uganda.
John C RekInfectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Nagongera Hospital, Tororo, Uganda.
Chris DrakeleyDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah G StaedkeDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Martin J DonnellyDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Teun BousemaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Melissa ConradDepartment of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Sara Lynn BlankenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen.

Funding

Transmission ProjectU19AI089674 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MATTHEW G DORSEY, MOSES Robert KAMYA · 2010 to 2026
$29.3M
The impact of antimalarials and insecticide resistance on malaria transmission in UgandaK01TW010868 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CONRAD, MELISSA D · 2018 to 2022
$706k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW010868NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of our understanding of malaria transmission comes from mosquito feeding assays using Anopheles mosquitoes from colonies that are well adapted to membrane feeding. This raises the question whether results from colony mosquitoes lead to overestimates of outcomes in wild Anopheles mosquitoes. We successfully established an Anopheles colony using progeny of wild Anopheles gambiae s.s. mosquitoes (Busia mosquitoes) and directly compared their susceptibility to infection with Plasmodium falciparum with the widely used An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes (Kisumu mosquitoes) using gametocyte-infected Ugandan donor blood. The proportion of infectious feeds did not differ between Busia (71.8%, 23/32) and Kisumu (68.8%, 22/32, P = 1.00) mosquitoes. When correcting for random effects of donor blood, we observed a 23% higher proportion of infected Busia mosquitoes than infected Kisumu mosquitoes (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.10-1.38, P < 0.001). This study suggests that feeding assays with Kisumu mosquitoes do not overestimate outcomes in wild An. gambiae s.s. mosquitoes, the mosquito species most relevant to malaria transmission in Uganda.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaMalaria, FalciparumAnimalsHumansMosquito VectorsPlasmodium falciparumUganda

Identifiers

PMID38150729
PMCPMC10859803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.