Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150397›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Centromere-proximal suppression of meiotic crossovers in Drosophila is robust to changes in centromere number, repetitive DNA content, and centromere-clustering.

Nila M Pazhayam, Leah K Frazier, Jeff Sekelsky

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Meiosis-specific decoupling of the pericentromere from the kinetochore.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nila M PazhayamCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Leah K FrazierSURE-REU Program in Biological Mechanisms, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9604-8532
Jeff SekelskyCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-677X
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Meiotic and Mitotic RecombinationR35GM118127 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI JEFF J. SEKELSKY · 2016 to 2026
$6.0M
NRSA in GeneticsT32GM135128 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Daniel J McKay, JEFF J. SEKELSKY · 2020 to 2026
$5.1M
Preventing Age-Associated Oocyte Aneuploidy: Mechanisms Behind the Drosophila melanogaster Centromere EffectF31AG079626 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PAZHAYAM, NILA MADASSARY · 2022 to 2024
$118k
NIA NIH HHS 1F31AG079626-01NIA NIH HHS F31 AG079626NIGMS NIH HHS 1R35GM118127NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118127NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM135128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis depends on both the presence and the regulated placement of crossovers (COs). The centromere effect, or CO exclusion in pericentromeric regions of the chromosome, is a meiotic CO patterning phenomenon that helps prevent nondisjunction, thereby protecting against chromosomal disorders and other meiotic defects. Despite being identified nearly a century ago, the mechanisms behind this fundamental cellular process remain unknown, with most studies of the Drosophila centromere effect focusing on local influences of the centromere and pericentric heterochromatin. In this study, we sought to investigate whether dosage changes in centromere number and repetitive DNA content affect the strength of the centromere effect, using phenotypic recombination mapping. Additionally, we studied the effects of repetitive DNA function on centromere effect strength using satellite DNA-binding protein mutants displaying defective centromere-clustering in meiotic nuclei. Despite what previous studies suggest, our results show that the Drosophila centromere effect is robust to changes in centromere number, repetitive DNA content, as well as repetitive DNA function. Our study suggests that the centromere effect is unlikely to be spatially controlled, providing novel insight into the mechanisms behind the Drosophila centromere effect.

Indexed as

DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsCentromereChromosome SegregationDNAMeiosisDNADrosophila Proteinscentromerecrossoverheterochromatinmeiosissatellite DNA

Identifiers

PMID38150397
PMCPMC10917511
OpenAlexW4390265041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.