Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150257›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Genomic Profiles and Clinical Outcomes of Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Elevated Tumor Mutational Burden.

Andrea Necchi, Philippe E Spiess, Tiago Costa de Padua, Roger Li, Petros Grivas, Richard S P Huang, Douglas I Lin, Natalie Danziger, Jeffrey S Ross, Joseph M Jacob and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Tumor-infiltrating plasma cells are a prognostic factor in penile squamous cell carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Inflammation in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. New Therapeutic Horizons for Advanced or Metastatic Penile Cancer.The Urologic clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea NecchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Philippe E SpiessDepartment of GU Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Tiago Costa de PaduaDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Roger LiDepartment of GU Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Petros GrivasDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Richard S P HuangFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Douglas I LinFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Natalie DanzigerFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey S RossFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Joseph M JacobSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Rebecca A SagerSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Alina BasnetSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Gerald LiFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ryon P GrafFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Dean C PavlickFoundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Gennady BratslavskySUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Foundation Medicine (United States)SUNY Upstate Medical University · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a putative biomarker of efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies of solid tumors, but not specifically for penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). Objective: To characterize biomarker features and ICI therapy outcomes associated with high TMB in PSCC in the routine clinical practice setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, 397 PSCC cases were analyzed to identify genomic alterations in more than 300 cancer-associated genes and genomic signatures, including TMB, using a hybrid capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling assay. Tumor mutational burden was categorized as low (<10 mutations per megabase [mut/Mb]), high (10-19 mut/Mb), or very high (≥20 mut/Mb). Germline status of genetic alterations was predicted using a validated somatic-germline computational method. Clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic PSCC receiving first-line ICI were abstracted using the deidentified nationwide Clinico-Genomic Database (CGDB) from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2022. Exposure: Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed using FoundationOne and FoundationOne CDx assays from Foundation Medicine Inc. Main outcomes and measures: The spectrum of genetic alterations by TMB level in PSCC, the percentage of germline genetic alterations, and the outcome (overall survival with routine clinical treatment) by TMB of chemotherapy-naive patients with PSCC who received ICI treatment up front were assessed in this descriptive study. Results: Among 397 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [54-73] years; 266 [67.0%] of European, 83 [20.9%] of admixed American, and 34 [8.5%] of African or other genomic ancestry), the median (IQR) age (eg, 65 [53-73] years for low TMB vs 68 [61-78] years for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) and genomic ancestry distribution (eg, European 228 of 339 [67.3%] for low TMB vs 38 of 58 [65.5%] for TMB ≥10 mut/Mb) were similar between TMB subgroups. There were 339 PSCC cases (85.4%) with low TMB, 40 cases (10.1%) with high TMB, and 18 cases (4.5%) with very high TMB. Comparisons of TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher vs low TMB showed an enrichment of genetic alterations in PIK3CA (48.3% vs 18.3%; P < .001) and KMT2D (29.3% vs 7.7%; P < .001) and less frequent genetic alterations in CDKN2A (25.9% vs 45.7%; P = .05). Most genetic alterations did not co-occur. Human papillomavirus identification was more frequent as TMB increased: 28.3% for low TMB, 50.0% for high, and 72.2% for very high. In total, 95 of 1377 genetic alterations (6.9%) were germline. Of 10 patients identified from the CGDB receiving frontline ICIs, median (IQR) follow-up was 9.9 months. Four patients had overall survival with clinical treatment of more than 12 months, including 2 of 3 patients with TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of advanced metastatic PSCC based on TMB levels, significant differences were observed for biomarkers in nearly 15% of patients with a TMB of 10 mut/Mb or higher. Germline testing and ICI-based therapy should be integrated into the management of selected PSCC cases.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellPenile NeoplasmsAgedBiological AssayBiomarkersCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38150257
PMCPMC10753400
OpenAlexW4390265428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.