Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150254›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Virtual Visits With Own Family Physician vs Outside Family Physician and Emergency Department Use.

Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Christine Salahub, Peter C Austin, Li Bai, R Sacha Bhatia, Cherryl Bird, Richard H Glazier, Lindsay Hedden, Noah M Ivers, Danielle Martin and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Demographics and costs of pediatric blepharitis and conjunctivitis seen in California emergency departments over a 10-year period.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Government partnerships with corporate virtual primary care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Integration as innovation in healthcare systems.Healthcare management forum · 2025
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lauren Lapointe-ShawUniversity Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christine SalahubUniversity Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter C AustinICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Li BaiICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
R Sacha BhatiaDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Cherryl BirdPatient Partner, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Richard H GlazierICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lindsay HeddenFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Noah M IversICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle MartinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer ShuldinerWomen's College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sheryl SpithoffDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mina TadrousICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara KiranICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Virtual visits became more common after the COVID-19 pandemic, but it is unclear in what context they are best used. Objective: To investigate whether there was a difference in subsequent emergency department use between patients who had a virtual visit with their own family physician vs those who had virtual visits with an outside physician. Design, Setting, and Participants: This propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted among all Ontario residents attached to a family physician as of April 1, 2021, who had a virtual family physician visit in the subsequent year (to March 31, 2022). Exposure: The type of virtual family physician visit, with own or outside physician, was determined. In a secondary analysis, own physician visits were compared with visits with a physician working in direct-to-consumer telemedicine. Main Outcome and Measure: The primary outcome was an emergency department visit within 7 days after the virtual visit. Results: Among 5 229 240 Ontario residents with a family physician and virtual visit, 4 173 869 patients (79.8%) had a virtual encounter with their own physician (mean [SD] age, 49.3 [21.5] years; 2 420 712 females [58.0%]) and 1 055 371 patients (20.2%) had an encounter with an outside physician (mean [SD] age, 41.8 [20.9] years; 605 614 females [57.4%]). In the matched cohort of 1 885 966 patients, those who saw an outside physician were 66% more likely to visit an emergency department within 7 days than those who had a virtual visit with their own physician (30 748 of 942 983 patients [3.3%] vs 18 519 of 942 983 patients [2.0%]; risk difference, 1.3% [95% CI, 1.2%-1.3%]; relative risk, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.63-1.69]). The increase in the risk of emergency department visits was greater when comparing 30 216 patients with definite direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits with 30 216 patients with own physician visits (risk difference, 4.1% [95% CI, 3.8%-4.5%]; relative risk, 2.99 [95% CI, 2.74-3.27]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, patients whose virtual visit was with an outside physician were more likely to visit an emergency department in the next 7 days than those whose virtual visit was with their own family physician. These findings suggest that primary care virtual visits may be best used within an existing clinical relationship.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physicians, FamilyAdultCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemics

Identifiers

PMID38150254
PMCPMC10753397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.