Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150190›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2024

Usefulness of the DN4, S-LANSS, and painDETECT screening questionnaires to detect the neuropathic pain components in people with acute whiplash-associated disorders: a cross-sectional study.

Marta Ríos-León, Julian Taylor, Antonio Segura-Fragoso, Andrés Barriga-Martín

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta Ríos-LeónSensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (SESCAM), Toledo 45071, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9110-139X
Julian TaylorSensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (SESCAM), Toledo 45071, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2553-2348
Antonio Segura-FragosoSensorimotor Function Group, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (SESCAM), Toledo 45071, Spain.
Andrés Barriga-MartínDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (SESCAM), Toledo 45071, Spain.
Servicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha · ESUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

ADESLAS-Mutua Madrileña (2020) and MINECO PID2020-119948RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough the presence of neuropathic pain (NP) components has been reported in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), no studies have analyzed the usefulness of NP screening questionnaires to detect NP components in WAD. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of 3 NP screening tools (Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4], self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [S-LANSS], and painDETECT questionnaire [PDQ]) to detect the presence of NP components in acute WAD.

designA cross-sectional study.

settingHospital. SUBJECTS: Of 188 eligible individuals, 50 people (68% women, mean age = 40.3 ± 12.5 years) with acute WAD (52% Grade III) were included.

methodsSpecialized physicians initially screened participants for the presence of NP components according to clinical practice and international recommendations. After physician assessment, blinded investigators used NP screening questionnaires (DN4, S-LANSS, and PDQ) to assess participants within 2 weeks of their accident. The diagnostic accuracy of these tools was analyzed and compared with the reference standard (physicians' assessments).

resultsThe 3 screening questionnaires showed excellent discriminant validity (area under the curve: ≥0.8), especially S-LANSS (area under the curve: 0.9; P < .001). DN4 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (87%), followed by S-LANSS (75%), while S-LANSS and PDQ showed the highest specificity (85% and 82%, respectively). These tools demonstrated a strong correlation with the reference standard (S-LANSS: rho = 0.7; PDQ: rho = 0.62; DN4: rho = 0.7; all, P < .001).

conclusionsThe DN4, S-LANSS, and PDQ show excellent discriminant validity to detect the presence of NP components in acute WAD, especially S-LANSS. Initial screening with these tools might improve management of WAD.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaPain MeasurementWhiplash InjuriesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and QuestionnairesDN4neuropathic pain componentspainDETECTS-LANSSwhiplash-associated disorders

Identifiers

PMID38150190
PMCPMC11063748
OpenAlexW4390265413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.