Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150157›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2023

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the New Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Ibrahim H Ozata, Tutku Tufekci, Salih Nafiz Karahan, Serkan Sucu, Dilara Yigit, Emre Ozoran, Oyku Ozturk, Mert Veznikli, Arzu Baygul, Ahmet Onur Demirel and 17 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim H OzataDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye. iozata@kuh.ku.edu.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6749-8518
Tutku TufekciDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Salih Nafiz KarahanDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Serkan SucuDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Dilara YigitDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Emre OzoranDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Oyku OzturkClinical Trials Unit, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mert VeznikliDepartment of Biostatistics, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Arzu BaygulDepartment of Biostatistics, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ahmet Onur DemirelDepartment of General Surgery, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye.
Ahmet Can KoyuncuogluDepartment of General Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Kutay DemirkirDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yasemin YildirimDepartment of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.
Meryem TuncakDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Mehmet Ali KocDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Tayfun BisginDepartment of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.
Ramazan KozanDepartment of General Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Cemil Burak KulleDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ismail Cem ErayDepartment of General Surgery, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Türkiye.
Cihangir AkyolDepartment of General Surgery, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Metin KeskinDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Selman SokmenDepartment of General Surgery, Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.
Sezai LeventogluDepartment of General Surgery, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ahmet RencuzogullariDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ayise KaradagSchool of Nursing, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Dursun BugraDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Emre BalikDepartment of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Koç University · TRAnkara University · TRDokuz Eylül University · TRGazi University · TRIstanbul University · TRCukurova University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to adapt and validate the Cleveland Clinic Colorectal Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (CCF-CaQL) in Turkish, addressing the significant need for reliable, language-specific QoL measures for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Turkiye. This effort fills a critical gap in CRC patient care, enhancing both patient-provider communication and disease-specific QoL assessment.

methodsThe CCF-CaQL was translated into Turkish, verified for accuracy, and reviewed for clarity and relevance. Eligible patients who underwent colorectal surgery for cancer between July 2021 and July 2022 from six hospitals completed the CCF-CaQL and SF-36 questionnaires. For analysis, confirmatory factor analysis using Smart PLS 4 and descriptive statistics were employed. The questionnaire's reliability and validity were assessed using Cronbach alpha, composite reliability, and the heterotrait-monotrait (HTMT) ratio, along with multicollinearity checks and factor loadings. Nonparametric resampling was used for precise error and confidence interval calculations, and the Spearman coefficient and split-half method were applied for reliability testing.

resultsIn the study involving 244 colorectal cancer patients, confirmatory factor analysis of the CCF-CaQL indicated effective item performance, with one item removed due to lower factor loading. The questionnaire exhibited high internal consistency, evidenced by a Cronbach alpha value of 0.909. Convergent validity was strong, with all average variance extracted (AVE) values exceeding 0.4. Discriminant validity was confirmed with HTMT coefficients below 0.9, and no significant multicollinearity issues were observed (VIF values < 10). Parallel testing with the SF-36 scale demonstrated moderate to very strong correlations, affirming the CCF-CaQL's comparability in measuring quality of life.

conclusionThe Turkish version of the CCF-CaQL was validated for assessing quality of life in colorectal cancer patients. This validation confirms its reliability and cultural appropriateness for use in Turkiye. The disease-specific nature of the CCF-CaQL makes it a useful tool in clinical and research settings, enhancing patient care by accurately monitoring treatment effects and interventions in the Turkish colorectal cancer patient population.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHumansLanguageReproducibility of ResultsTurkeyColorectal cancerColorectal surgeryQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID38150157
OpenAlexW4390267296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.