ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024
A precise blood transfusion evaluation model for aortic surgery: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac aortic surgery is an extremely complicated procedure that often requires large volume blood transfusions during the operation. Currently, it is not possible to accurately estimate the intraoperative blood transfusion volume before surgery. Therefore, in this study, to determine the clinically precise usage of blood for intraoperative blood transfusions during aortic surgery, we established a predictive model based on machine learning algorithms. We performed a retrospective analysis on 4,285 patients who received aortic surgery in Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 2018 and September 2022. Ultimately, 3,654 patients were included in the study, including 2,557 in the training set and 1,097 in the testing set. By utilizing 13 current mainstream models and a large-scale cardiac aortic surgery dataset, we built a novel machine learning model for accurately predicting intraoperative red blood cell transfusion volume. Based on the transfusion-related risk factors that the model identified, we also established the relevant variables that affected the results. The results revealed that decision tree models were the most suitable for predicting the blood transfusion volume during aortic surgery. In particular, the mean absolute error for the best-performing extremely randomized forest model was 1.17 U, while the R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.