ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024
Early prediction of mortality at sepsis diagnosis time in critically ill patients by using interpretable machine learning.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for mortality in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Using interpretable machine learning to analyze the trajectory changes of serum albumin to predict the mortality rate of sepsis: a cohort study based on MIMIC-IV.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Enhancing large language model clinical support information with machine learning risk and explainability: a feasibility study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study applied machine learning for the early prediction of 30-day mortality at sepsis diagnosis time in critically ill patients. Retrospective study using data collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. The data of the patient cohort was divided on the basis of the year of hospitalization, into training (2008-2013), validation (2014-2016), and testing (2017-2019) datasets. 24,377 patients with the sepsis diagnosis time < 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were included. A gradient boosting tree-based algorithm (XGBoost) was used for training the machine learning model to predict 30-day mortality at sepsis diagnosis time in critically ill patients. Model performance was measured in both discrimination and calibration aspects. The model was interpreted using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) module. The 30-day mortality rate of the testing dataset was 17.9%, and 39 features were selected for the machine learning model. Model performance on the testing dataset achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.853 (95% CI 0.837-0.868) and an area under the precision-recall curves of 0.581 (95% CI 0.541-0.619). The calibration plot for the model revealed a slope of 1.03 (95% CI 0.94-1.12) and intercept of 0.14 (95% CI 0.04-0.25). The SHAP revealed the top three most significant features, namely age, increased red blood cell distribution width, and respiratory rate. Our study demonstrated the feasibility of using the interpretable machine learning model to predict mortality at sepsis diagnosis time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38150124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.