Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150115›Full record

SynthesisMusculoskeletal surgery2024

High-intensity focused ultrasound-a needleless management for osteoid osteoma: a systematic review.

K Ciatawi, I W S Dusak, I G E Wiratnaya

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K CiatawiFaculty of Medicine, University of North Sumatera, Medan, Indonesia. kartiniciatawi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5473-550X
I W S DusakDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4823-7926
I G E WiratnayaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9508-2891
Udayana University · IDUniversitas Sumatera Utara · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoid osteoma is one of the most frequent benign musculoskeletal neoplasm. Radiofrequency ablation is the method of choice for non-conservative treatment of osteoid osteoma. Recently, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been proposed as a safer option. The objective of this study is to review the efficacy and side effects of HIFU in the management of osteoid osteoma. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, and Clinical Key until June 30, 2022. Demographic data, baseline characteristics, success rates, pre- and post-procedure pain scores, recurrences, and complications were recorded. Eleven studies were included in this systematic review. Pooled analysis that involved 186 subjects resulted in an overall success rate of 91.94%. Recurrence was reported in two studies, in which it occurred in 4/177 (2.26%) subjects. Skin burn was found in 1 (0.54%) patients. No major or other complications were reported. Three studies compared the success rate of HIFU and RFA. Success rate was slightly higher in the RFA group with insignificant difference (p = 0.15). High-intensity focused ultrasound showed promising results. It offers a safer treatment approach for osteoid osteoma, especially in children, and can be considered for recalcitrant cases after RFA. Nonetheless, more studies are expected in the future.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationOsteoma, OsteoidAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiofrequency AblationTreatment OutcomeHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundInterventional radiologyOsteoid osteomaThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID38150115
OpenAlexW4390269305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.