ArticlePediatric radiology2024
Reversed cortico-medullary differentiation in the fetal and neonatal kidneys: an indicator of poor prognosis?
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reversed cortico-medullary differentiation in kidneys on fetal magnetic resonance imaging - a case series.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Prenatal imaging of upper urinary tract abnormalities: when is MRI useful?Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- ESPR 2023-Building new bridges from Belgrade.Pediatric radiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBilateral reversed cortico-medullary differentiation is rarely observed on fetal or neonatal renal ultrasound and is therefore a diagnostic challenge.
objectiveOur purpose was to widen the differential diagnoses of fetal and neonatal nephropathies introducing reversed cortico-medullary differentiation as a clue either on obstetric US or during follow-up of hyperechoic kidneys in order to improve the management of such rare clinical situations. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the US images of 11 patients showing bilateral reversed cortico-medullary differentiation on prenatal examination or in which this pattern developed postnatally in the follow-up of fetal hyperechoic kidneys. For each patient, a precise diagnosis was established either on clinical assessment or, when available, on histological or genetic findings.
resultsSix fetuses displayed bilateral reversed cortico-medullary differentiation on obstetric examination, and the pattern persisted throughout pregnancy. In the five other fetuses, the kidneys appeared initially homogeneously hyperechoic; this evolved into reversed cortico-medullary differentiation during the third trimester in two cases and shortly after birth in three cases. Two pregnancies were terminated because of estimated poor prognosis. In the nine surviving neonates, four died of renal failure in the post-natal period. The clinical evolution was more favorable in the remaining five newborns.
conclusionsSix different diagnoses were established in patients presenting with a reversed cortico-medullary differentiation renal pattern. This finding was associated with poor outcome in six cases. An acute prenatal diagnosis of reversed cortico-medullary differentiation improves pre- and postnatal work-up and guides counseling and genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.