Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150078›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024

Repair of parastomal hernia after Bricker procedure: retrospective consecutive experience of a tertiary center.

L Goffioul, D Zjukovitsj, M Moise, D Waltregny, O Detry

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outcomes of surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a bayesian network meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L GoffioulDepartment of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Division of Abdominal Wall Surgery, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Sart Tilman B35, B4000, Liege, Belgium.
D ZjukovitsjDepartment of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Division of Abdominal Wall Surgery, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Sart Tilman B35, B4000, Liege, Belgium.
M MoiseDepartment of Radiology, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
D WaltregnyDepartment of Urology, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
O DetryDepartment of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, Division of Abdominal Wall Surgery, CHU Liege, University of Liege, Sart Tilman B35, B4000, Liege, Belgium. olivier.detry@chuliege.be.ORCID 0000-0002-9436-6673
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIleal conduit parastomal hernias (ICPHs) are frequent after radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion, but their management is debated. This study aimed to review the results of ICPH repair according to Sugarbaker or Sandwich techniques, with special interest in ICPH recurrence and urological complications.

methodsThe authors reviewed a consecutive series of patients undergoing ICPH repair between January 2014 and December 2020. Primary endpoints were ICPH recurrences at clinical exam and cross-sectional abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans. Secondary endpoints were any other complications possibly related to the ICPH repair.

resultsTwenty-three patients underwent ICPH repair surgery (16 Sugarbaker and 7 Sandwich techniques) during the study period. Sixteen patients underwent a primary laparoscopic approach. All but one patient underwent at least one abdominal CT during the follow-up. Median clinical and CT scan follow-up times were 57 and 50.5 months, respectively. Clinical and CT ICPH recurrence rates were 4.5% and 13% at 5 years, respectively. Eighteen patients (78%) suffered no urological complications during the follow-up period, but three patients (13%) needed redo surgery on the urinary ileal conduit.

conclusionThe modified Sugarbaker or Sandwich techniques might be considered as promising techniques for ICPH repair with a low rate of recurrence. The urological complications, and particularly the ileal conduit-related issues, need to be evaluated in further studies. Controlled and prospective data are required to compare the Sugarbaker and Sandwich techniques to the Keyhole approach for ICPH repairs.

Indexed as

HerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaUrinary DiversionAgedCystectomyFemaleHernia, VentralHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdominal wallColostomyComplicationHerniaIleostomy

Identifiers

PMID38150078
OpenAlexW4390268785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.