Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38150027›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024

Embracing the (r)evolution of social media and digital scholarship in pediatric nephrology education.

Shweta S Shah, Emily Zangla, Md Abdul Qader, Swasti Chaturvedi, Sai Sudha Mannemuddhu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shweta S ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Renal Division, Houston, TX, USA.
Emily ZanglaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Md Abdul QaderDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Square Hospitals Ltd, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Swasti ChaturvediDepartment of Nephrology, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sai Sudha MannemuddhuDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, East Tennessee Children's Hospital, 2100 W. Clinch Ave, Suite 310 (MOB), Knoxville, TN, 37916, USA. dr.saisudhamm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7106-1527

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free Open-Access Medical Education (FOAMed) has transformed medical education in the past decade by complementing and substituting for traditional medical education when needed. The attractiveness of FOAMed resources is due to their inexpensive nature, wide availability, and user ability to access on demand across a variety of devices, making it easy to create, share, and participate. The subject of nephrology is complex, fascinating, and challenging. Traditional didactic lectures can be passive and ineffective in uncovering these difficult concepts and may need frequent revisions. Active teaching methods like flipped classrooms have shown some benefits, and these benefits can only be multifold with current social media tools. Social media will inspire the involvement of students and allow them to create and share educational content in a "trendy way," encouraging the participation of their peers and thus building an educational environment more conducive to them while promoting revision and retainment. FOAMed also promotes asynchronous learning, spaced learning, microlearning, and multimodal presentation with a meaningful variation. This article discusses the evolution of digital education, social media platforms, tools for creating and developing FOAMed resources, and digital scholarship.

Indexed as

NephrologyPediatricsSocial MediaCurriculumEducation, DistanceEducation, MedicalHumansDigital scholarshipFree Open-Access Medical Education (FOAMed)Medical educationPodcastsSocial mediaTweetorialsTwitterVisual abstracts

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.