Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38149485›Full record

Observational studyJournal of perioperative practice2024

Comparing preoperative fasting and ultrasound-measured intravascular volume status in elective surgery, enhanced recovery patients versus inpatient, urgent surgery patients and the ability of IVC collapsibility to predict post-induction hypotension.

Jacob R Wrobel, Justin C Magin, David Williams, Xinming An, Jacob D Acton, Alexander S Doyal, Shawn Jia, James C Krakowski, Ricardo Serrano, Stuart A Grant and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of perioperative practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 61% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob R WrobelUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-6572-2636
Justin C MaginUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
David WilliamsDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Xinming AnUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jacob D ActonUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alexander S DoyalUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Shawn JiaUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
James C KrakowskiUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2820-3419
Ricardo SerranoUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Stuart A GrantUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
David N FlynnUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Duncan J McLeanUNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
University of North Carolina Health Care · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypotension following induction of general anaesthesia has been shown to result in increased complications and mortality postoperatively. Patients admitted to the hospital undergoing urgent surgery are often fasted from fluids for significant periods compared to elective patients subject to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols despite guidelines stating that a two-hour fast is sufficient. The aim of this prospective, observational study was to compare fasting times and intravascular volume status between elective surgery patients subject to enhanced recovery protocols and inpatient, urgent surgery patients and to assess differences in the incidence of post-induction hypotension. Fasting data was obtained by questionnaire in the preoperative area in addition to inferior vena cava collapsibility index, a non-invasive measure of intravascular volume. Blood pressure readings and drug administration for the ten minutes following induction were obtained from patients' charts. Inpatients undergoing urgent surgery were fasted significantly longer than enhanced recovery patients and had lower intravascular volume. However, no difference was found in the incidence of post-induction hypotension.

Indexed as

Elective Surgical ProceduresFastingHypotensionVena Cava, InferiorAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPreoperative CareProspective StudiesUltrasonographyEnhanced recoveryIVC collapsibilityPerioperative medicinePOCUS

Identifiers

PMID38149485
PMCPMC11531071
OpenAlexW4390273700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.