Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38149291›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2024

Validity and reliability of SEIS-3: An instrument for subjective measuring of strength in older adults.

Renato Sobral-Monteiro-Junior, Luciana Aparecida Coutinho, Vinícius Dias Rodrigues, Frederico Sander Mansur Machado, Wellington Danilo Soares, Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Camila Cristina Fonseca Bicalho

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Renato Sobral-Monteiro-JuniorStudy and Research Group in Neuroscience, Exercise, Health and Sport (GENESEs), Physical Education Department, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luciana Aparecida CoutinhoStudy and Research Group in Neuroscience, Exercise, Health and Sport (GENESEs), Physical Education Department, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vinícius Dias RodriguesStudy and Research Group in Neuroscience, Exercise, Health and Sport (GENESEs), Physical Education Department, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Frederico Sander Mansur MachadoStudy and Research Group in Neuroscience, Exercise, Health and Sport (GENESEs), Physical Education Department, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Wellington Danilo SoaresPhysical Education Department, State University of Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Henrique Nunes Pereira OlivaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Camila Cristina Fonseca BicalhoHuman Movement Sciences Department, State University of Minas Gerais, Ibirité, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of rating of perceived exertion (RPE) has grown substantially, providing a valuable alternative for exercise intensity monitoring, especially for older adults. However, some challenges, such as cross-cultural validity, age-related differences, and reliability issues, necessitate the development of a concise and user-friendly RPE instrument, particularly for strength training in this population. This study aimed to validate the Subjective Effort Induction Scale (SEIS-3), a simplified tool for measuring effort during strength training. SEIS-3 is a graded instrument with three exertion levels: 1) Light effort, 2) Moderate effort, and 3) Strong effort. Twenty seniors, aged 71±7 years, of both genders participated in the study (CEP/Unimontes 2,741,071/2018). We collected maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC) data using a digital dynamometer. Subsequently, participants underwent the initial test, following the three SEIS-3 categories in a randomly assigned order of induced subjective effort. SEIS-3 instrument was evaluated by the approaches:•Linear regression analysis: employed to assess the validity of the instrument.•Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC): employed to assess the reliability of the instrument.SEIS-3 effort categories correlated with MIVC in both hands (R

Indexed as

ElderlyPhysical exertionResistance trainingStrength trainingSubjective Effort Induction Scale (SEIS-3)

Identifiers

PMID38149291
PMCPMC10750096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.