Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38149285›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2023

Writing an External Letter of Review for Promotion.

Suzanne Minor, Sarah E Stumbar, Joanna Drowos, Jennifer Hartmark-Hill, Victoria Hayes, Jeanne Cawse-Lucas, Parvathi Perumareddi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suzanne MinorFlorida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, University Park, FL.
Sarah E StumbarFlorida International University Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, University Park, FL.
Joanna DrowosCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.
Jennifer Hartmark-HillUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ.
Victoria HayesMaine Medical Center, Portland, ME.
Jeanne Cawse-LucasUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Parvathi PerumareddiCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Academic promotion, representing achievement of a level of distinction in one's body of work, is an honorable accomplishment in a faculty member's career. External letters of review written by faculty at higher ranks are a critical component of the promotion portfolio. We discuss key considerations for writing external letters. These considerations can be used to mentor this skill for less experienced letter writers. We also highlight how professional societies can aid faculty in developing and strengthening writing and mentoring capabilities for this vital task.

Identifiers

PMID38149285
PMCPMC10751099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.