Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38149217›Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2023

Co-designing clinical trials alongside youth with chronic pain.

Zina Zaslawski, Katherine Dib, Vivian W L Tsang, Serena L Orr, Kathryn A Birnie, Trinity Lowthian, Zahra Alidina, Melila Chesick-Gordis, Lauren E Kelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zina ZaslawskiGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.
Katherine DibPatient Partner Canadian Collaborative for Childhood Cannabinoid Therapeutics (C4T) Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
Vivian W L TsangKidsCan Young Persons' Research Advisory Group under the Maternal Infant Child and Youth Research Network Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Serena L OrrDivision of Neurology Alberta Children's Hospital Calgary Alberta Canada.
Kathryn A BirnieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8223-8834
Trinity LowthianPatient Partner Canadian Collaborative for Childhood Cannabinoid Therapeutics (C4T) Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Zahra AlidinaPatient Partner Canadian Collaborative for Childhood Cannabinoid Therapeutics (C4T) Holland Landing Ontario Canada.
Melila Chesick-GordisPatient Partner Canadian Collaborative for Childhood Cannabinoid Therapeutics (C4T) Vancouver British Columbia Canada.
Lauren E KellyGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation Winnipeg Manitoba Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7567-0816
Canadian Association of Nurses in Oncology · CAChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba · CAUniversity of Calgary · CABC Research (Canada) · CACanadian Patient Safety Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Youth have a right to participate in research that will inform the care that they receive. Engagement with children and young people has been shown to improve rates of enrollment and retention in clinical trials as well as reduce research waste. The aim of the study is to gain practical insight on the design of trials specifically on (1) recruitment and retention preferences, (2) potential barriers to research, and (3) study design optimization. Based on this youth engagement, we will co-design two clinical trials in headaches with youth. Two recruitment strategies were used to recruit 16 youth from across Canada (aged 15-18 years) from an existing youth group, the KidsCan Young Persons' Research Advisory Group (YPRAG) and a new youth group in collaboration with Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP). Four virtual, semi-structured discussion groups were held between April and December 2020, which included pre-circulated materials and utilized two distinct upcoming planned trials as examples for specific methods feedback. Individual engagement evaluations were completed following the final group session using the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool. Descriptive results were shared with participants prior to publication to ensure appropriate interpretation. The discussion was centred around three themes: recruitment and retention preferences, potential barriers to participation, and study design optimization. Youth indicated that they would prefer to be contacted for a potential study directly by their physician (not over social media), that they would like to develop rapport with study staff, and that one of the barriers to participation is the time commitment. The youth also provided feedback on the design of the clinical trial including outcome measurement tools, data collection, and engagement methods. Feedback on the virtual format of the engagement events indicated that participants appreciated the ease of the online discussion and that the open-ended discussion allowed for easy exchange of ideas. They felt that despite a gender imbalance (towards females) it was an overall inclusive environment. All participants reported believing that their engagement will make a difference to the work of the research team in designing the clinical trials. Perspectives from a diverse group of youth meaningfully improved the design and conduct of two clinical trials for headaches in children. This study provides a framework for future researchers to engage youth in the co-design of clinical trials using online engagement sessions.

Indexed as

clinical trialsheadachepainpatient engagementpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID38149217
PMCPMC10749402
OpenAlexW4375865567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.