Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38149216›Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2023

Psychometric evaluation of the electronic faces thermometer scale for pain assessment in children 8-17 years old: A study protocol.

C Castor, M Björk, J Bai, H Berlin, G Kristjansdottir, O Kristjansdottir, H Hansson, A Höök, P Stenström, S Nilsson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

C CastorDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9188-2461
M BjörkThe CHILD Research Group, Department of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare Jönköping University Jönköping Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-2417
J BaiNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6726-5714
H BerlinDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology Malmö University Malmö Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3362-3362
G KristjansdottirFaculty of Nursing, School of Health Science University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland.
O KristjansdottirFaculty of Nursing, School of Health Science University of Iceland Reykjavik Iceland.
H HanssonDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Denmark.
A HöökDivision of Anaesthetics and Sensory Organs Speciality Surgery Linköping University Hospital Linköping Sweden.
P StenströmDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Skåne University Hospital, Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5052-9944
S NilssonDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8847-9559
Lund University · SEUniversity of Iceland · ISEmory University · USJönköping University · SELinköping University Hospital · SEMalmö University · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is often a challenge for a child to communicate their pain, and their possibilities to do so should be strengthened in healthcare settings. Digital self-assessment provides a potential solution for person-centered care in pain management and promotes child participation when a child is ill. A child's perception of pain assessment differs when it is assessed using digital or analog formats. As we move into the digital era, there is an urgent need to validate digital pain assessment tools, including the newly developed electronic Faces Thermometer Scale (eFTS). This study protocol describes three studies with the overall aim to evaluate psychometric properties of the eFTS for assessing pain in children 8-17 years of age. A multi-site project design combining quantitative and qualitative methods will be used for three observational studies. Study 1: 100 Swedish-speaking children will report the level of anticipated pain from vignettes describing painful situations in four levels of pain and a think-aloud method will be used for data collection. Data will be analyzed with phenomenography as well as descriptive and comparative statistics. Study 2: 600 children aged 8-17 years at pediatric and dental settings in Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, and USA will be included. Children will assess their pain intensity due to medical or dental procedures, surgery, or acute pain using three different pain Scales for each time point; the eFTS, the Faces Pain Scale Revised, and the Coloured Analogue Scale. Descriptive and comparative statistics will be used, with subanalysis taking cultural context into consideration. Study 3: A subgroup of 20 children out of these 600 children will be purposely included in an interview to describe experiences of grading their own pain using the eFTS. Qualitative data will be analyzed with content analysis. Our pilot studies showed high level of adherence to the study procedure and rendered only a small revision of background questionnaires. Preliminary analysis indicated that the instruments are adequate to be used by children and that the analysis plan is feasible. A digital pain assessment tool contributes to an increase in pain assessment in pediatric care. The Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions in healthcare supports a thorough development of a new scale. By evaluating psychometric properties in several settings by both qualitative and quantitative methods, the eFTS will become a well-validated tool to strengthen the child's voice within healthcare.

Indexed as

digital tooleFTSpain assessmentpediatric painpsychometric evaluationvalidation

Identifiers

PMID38149216
PMCPMC10749404
OpenAlexW4328131338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.