Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38149198›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Radiogenomics for predicting microsatellite instability status and PD-L1 expression with machine learning in endometrial cancers: A multicenter study.

Qianling Li, Ya'nan Huang, Yang Xia, Meiping Li, Wei Tang, Minming Zhang, Zhenhua Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric and Gynecological MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qianling LiDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Shaoxing, 312000, China.
Ya'nan HuangDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000, China.
Yang XiaDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Shaoxing, 312000, China.
Meiping LiDepartment of Pathology, Shaoxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, 312000, China.
Wei TangDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000, China.
Minming ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310000, China.
Zhenhua ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Shaoxing People's Hospital (Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine), Shaoxing, 312000, China.
Shaoxing People's Hospital · CNShaoxing City Women and Children Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning model based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying microsatellite instability (MSI) status and PD-L1 expression in endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: This retrospective study included 82 EC patients from 2 independent centers. Radiomics features from the intratumoral and peritumoral regions, obtained from four conventional MRI sequences (T2-weighted images; contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images; diffusion-weighted images; apparent diffusion coefficient), were combined with clinicopathologic characteristics to develop machine learning model for predicting MSI status and PD-L1 expression. 60 patients from center 1 were used as the training set for model construction, while 22 patients from center 2 were used as an external validation set for model evaluation. Results: For predicting MSI status, the clinicopathologic model, radscore model, and combination model achieved area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.728, 0.833, and 0.889 in the training set, respectively, and 0.595, 0.790, and 0.848 in the validation set, respectively. For predicting PD-L1 expression, the clinicopathologic model, radscore model, and combination model achieved AUCs of 0.648, 0.814, and 0.834 in the training set, respectively, and 0.660, 0.708, and 0.764 in the validation set, respectively. Calibration curve analysis and decision curve analysis demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility of the combination model. Conclusion: The machine learning model incorporating MRI-based radiomics features and clinicopathologic characteristics could be a potential tool for predicting MSI status and PD-L1 expression in EC. This approach may contribute to precision medicine for EC patients.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingMicrosatellite instabilityMismatch repair deficiencyPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID38149198
PMCPMC10750045
OpenAlexW4389235834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.