Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38149112›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2023

Effectiveness of ultrasound guided interfascial hydrodissection with the use of saline anesthetic solution for myofascial pain syndrome of the upper trapezius: a single blind randomized controlled trial.

Charidy Suarez-Ramos, Consuelo Gonzalez-Suarez, Ivan Neil Gomez, Maria Katherine Gonzalez, Philippe Hubert Co, Jose Alfonso Llamas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hydrorelease Within the Paraneural Sheath: A Cadaveric Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Ultrasound-Guided Fascial Hydrorelease for Persistent Pain After Hamstring Injury.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Exploring fascia in myofascial pain syndrome: an integrative model of mechanisms.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Ultrasound-Guided Fascial Hydrodissection with Eperisone: A Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety in Lumbodorsal Fasciitis Treatment.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charidy Suarez-Ramos *Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Consuelo Gonzalez-Suarez *Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Ivan Neil Gomez *Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.
Maria Katherine GonzalezPhysical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Gat Andres Bonifacio Medical Center, Manila, Philippines.
Philippe Hubert CoHealth Hub Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation Medicine and Orthopedics Clinic Inc., Manila, Philippines.
Jose Alfonso LlamasPhysical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Region I Medical Center, Dagupan City, Pangasinan, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is described as pain that arise from myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) which is a hyperirritable spot within a taut band of skeletal muscle. A newer needling technique called the interfascial hydrodissection (IH), wherein anesthetic saline solution (ASS) is injected between the fascia of the muscles using ultrasound as guide. It is theorized that this technique blocks the nerve branches and improve gliding in between the muscle and fascia. Objective: To determine the short and long-term effects of interfascial hydrodissection using 2% Lidocaine and saline solution compared to dry needling with MPS of the upper trapezius on pain and quality of life using. Methods: This study is a single-blind randomized controlled trial where ultrasound guided IH with ASS was compared to dry needling (DN) of the MTrPs. Both groups were taught self-stretch exercises (SSE) to be done everyday after the procedure. Outcome measures were pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and quality of life assessment with EQ-5D-5l questionnaire. All participants were assessed by a blinded assessor before the intervention, immediately after, 10 and 30 min, one week, two weeks, four weeks, three months, and six months after the procedure. Data Analysis: Two-way mixed ANOVA and follow-up independent Results: A total of 46 participants with two dropouts were all included during the final analysis. Both groups demonstrated significant differences in VAS scores between baseline and the different time points, the IH + SSE group demonstrated the more significant effect size at as compared to the DN + SSE group. For EQ-5D-5l, no statistical differences were seen in all dimensions but there was a larger effect size for usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Conclusion: Interfascial hydrodissection is a technique that can manage both short and long term symptoms of MPS. This could be utilized as an alternative management for those with chronic MPS of the upper trapezius. Philippine Health Research Registry ID: PHRR221003-005034.

Indexed as

interfascial hydrodissectionmyofascial pain syndromeupper back painupper trapeziuswet needling

Identifiers

PMID38149112
PMCPMC10750391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.